Re: Addr: Re: BGP-4 - revised I-D
Tony Li <tli@jnx.com> Wed, 28 August 1996 18:23 UTC
Received: from ietf.org by ietf.org id aa25274; 28 Aug 96 14:23 EDT
Received: from cnri by ietf.org id aa25270; 28 Aug 96 14:23 EDT
Received: from merit.edu by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa11232; 28 Aug 96 14:23 EDT
Received: (from daemon@localhost) by merit.edu (8.7.5/merit-2.0) id NAA19051
for idr-outgoing; Wed, 28 Aug 1996 13:44:24 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from interlock.ans.net (interlock.ans.net [147.225.5.5]) by
merit.edu (8.7.5/merit-2.0) with SMTP id NAA19043 for <bgp@merit.edu>;
Wed, 28 Aug 1996 13:44:18 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by interlock.ans.net id AA14997
(InterLock SMTP Gateway 3.0 for bgp@ans.net);
Wed, 28 Aug 1996 13:44:12 -0400
Received: by interlock.ans.net (Internal Mail Agent-2);
Wed, 28 Aug 1996 13:44:12 -0400
Received: by interlock.ans.net (Internal Mail Agent-1);
Wed, 28 Aug 1996 13:44:12 -0400
Date: Wed, 28 Aug 1996 10:44:02 -0700 (PDT)
Message-Id: <199608281744.KAA02559@chimp.jnx.com>
Sender: ietf-archive-request@ietf.org
From: Tony Li <tli@jnx.com>
To: curtis@ans.net
Cc: curtis@ans.net, jyy@ans.net, rwoundy@vnet.ibm.com, bgp@ans.net
In-Reply-To: <199608280714.DAA28875@brookfield.ans.net> (message from Curtis
Villamizar on Wed, 28 Aug 1996 03:14:33 -0400)
Subject: Re: Addr: Re: BGP-4 - revised I-D
X-Orig-Sender: owner-idr@merit.edu
Precedence: bulk
I'm not saying I want to compare MEDs across AS, just that if local-pref ends up the same I don't want a routing loop. Ah. But then the real request is that there needs to be a consistent tie-breaker after equal local pref's. Agreed. If you want to finess it with Rich Woundy's MED election rather than comparing MED across AS to avoid loops, then fine. The group seems to have come to consensus so please don't get pissed and start proposing new attributes. Me? Get pissed? ;-) We seemed to have already reached consensus on the list for Rich's MED election. We still don't have a proposed change in the BGP4 text. If Rich is busy I'll write something. Cool. Then at least we'll really have something solid to argue about. Me, I liked John's changes... ;-) Tony
- Addr: Re: BGP-4 - revised I-D rwoundy
- Re: Addr: Re: BGP-4 - revised I-D Curtis Villamizar
- RE: Addr: Re: BGP-4 - revised I-D NITTMANN Michael (MSMail)
- Re: Addr: Re: BGP-4 - revised I-D Curtis Villamizar
- Re: Addr: Re: BGP-4 - revised I-D Jessica Yu
- Re: Addr: Re: BGP-4 - revised I-D Tony Li
- Re: Addr: Re: BGP-4 - revised I-D Curtis Villamizar
- Re: Addr: Re: BGP-4 - revised I-D Curtis Villamizar
- Re: Addr: Re: BGP-4 - revised I-D John G. Scudder
- Re: Addr: Re: BGP-4 - revised I-D Curtis Villamizar
- Re: Addr: Re: BGP-4 - revised I-D Tony Li
- Re: Addr: Re: BGP-4 - revised I-D Curtis Villamizar
- Re: Addr: Re: BGP-4 - revised I-D Curtis Villamizar
- Re: Addr: Re: BGP-4 - revised I-D Tony Li
- Re: Addr: Re: BGP-4 - revised I-D John G. Scudder
- Re: Addr: Re: BGP-4 - revised I-D Tony Li
- Re: Addr: Re: BGP-4 - revised I-D Curtis Villamizar
- Re: FW: Addr: Re: BGP-4 - revised I-D Curtis Villamizar
- Re: Addr: Re: BGP-4 - revised I-D Curtis Villamizar
- Re: Addr: Re: BGP-4 - revised I-D Curtis Villamizar
- Re: Addr: Re: BGP-4 - revised I-D Tony Li
- Re: Addr: Re: BGP-4 - revised I-D Curtis Villamizar
- Re: Addr: Re: BGP-4 - revised I-D Tony Li
- Re: Addr: Re: BGP-4 - revised I-D John G. Scudder
- Re: Addr: Re: BGP-4 - revised I-D John G. Scudder
- FW: Addr: Re: BGP-4 - revised I-D NITTMANN Michael (MSMail)
- RE: FW: Addr: Re: BGP-4 - revised I-D NITTMANN Michael (MSMail)