Re: EBGP over unnumbered serial lines
Radha Gowda <rxg@proteon.com> Thu, 28 September 1995 20:56 UTC
Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa18074;
28 Sep 95 16:56 EDT
Received: from CNRI.Reston.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa18070;
28 Sep 95 16:56 EDT
Received: from interlock.ans.net by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa20752;
28 Sep 95 16:56 EDT
Received: by interlock.ans.net id AA23958
(InterLock SMTP Gateway 3.0 for iwg-out@ans.net);
Thu, 28 Sep 1995 16:52:58 -0400
Message-Id: <199509282052.AA23958@interlock.ans.net>
Received: by interlock.ans.net (Protected-side Proxy Mail Agent-2);
Thu, 28 Sep 1995 16:52:58 -0400
Received: by interlock.ans.net (Protected-side Proxy Mail Agent-1);
Thu, 28 Sep 1995 16:52:58 -0400
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: Radha Gowda <rxg@proteon.com>
Subject: Re: EBGP over unnumbered serial lines
To: Tony Li <tli@cisco.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Sep 1995 16:52:41 -0400 (EDT)
Cc: bgp@ans.net
In-Reply-To: <199509282045.NAA29234@greatdane.cisco.com> from "Tony Li" at Sep
28, 95 01:45:51 pm
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL22]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Length: 415
> Wow, you can do that? ;-) > > The correct answer (that Dimitry alludes to obliquely) is that if you > put your TCP peering address into the NEXT_HOP attribute that the > neighbor should accept it. Assuming the neighbor has a clue. No, we can't do that. I just wondered if you all experts out there have a way to do that ;-). Anyway, it did not even make sense to me and it was more of a curiosity question.
- EBGP over unnumbered serial lines Radha Gowda
- Re: EBGP over unnumbered serial lines Dimitry Haskin
- Re: EBGP over unnumbered serial lines Radha Gowda
- Re: EBGP over unnumbered serial lines Tony Li
- Re: EBGP over unnumbered serial lines Tony Li
- re: EBGP over unnumbered serial lines toconnor
- Re: EBGP over unnumbered serial lines Dennis Ferguson