Re: BGP-4+
Curtis Villamizar <curtis@ans.net> Fri, 20 December 1996 16:49 UTC
Received: from cnri by ietf.org id aa15010; 20 Dec 96 11:49 EST
Received: from merit.edu by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa13946; 20 Dec 96 11:49 EST
Received: (from daemon@localhost) by merit.edu (8.8.4/merit-2.0) id LAA28529
for idr-outgoing; Fri, 20 Dec 1996 11:09:17 -0500 (EST)
Received: from interlock.ans.net (interlock.ans.net [147.225.5.5]) by
merit.edu (8.8.4/merit-2.0) with SMTP id LAA28524 for <bgp@merit.edu>;
Fri, 20 Dec 1996 11:09:14 -0500 (EST)
Received: by interlock.ans.net id AA28427
(InterLock SMTP Gateway 3.0 for bgp@ans.net);
Fri, 20 Dec 1996 11:09:13 -0500
Received: by interlock.ans.net (Internal Mail Agent-1);
Fri, 20 Dec 1996 11:09:13 -0500
Message-Id: <199612201606.LAA28790@brookfield.ans.net>
To: Yakov Rekhter <yakov@cisco.com>
Cc: "John W. Stewart III" <jstewart@metro.isi.edu>, skh@merit.edu,
6bone@isi.edu, dkatz@cisco.com, bgp@ans.net
Reply-To: curtis@ans.net
Subject: Re: BGP-4+
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 18 Dec 1996 14:27:54 PST."
<199612182227.OAA19295@puli.cisco.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Dec 1996 11:06:31 -0500
From: Curtis Villamizar <curtis@ans.net>
Sender: owner-idr@merit.edu
Precedence: bulk
In message <199612182227.OAA19295@puli.cisco.com>om>, Yakov Rekhter writes: > John, > > > under what circumstances does a router send SNPAs? and > > what does a router do on receipt of SNPAs? > > One possible application for SNPA is operation of BGP over NBMA (e.g., > ATM). Passing SNPA allows to avoid any additional mechanisms to resolve > IP to SNPA mapping in the NBMA environment. This is a very worthwhile addition to BGP. Its amazing no one ever thought of this before. :-) > > also, from reading the draft, i'm assuming that you plan > > to support only ASs and not RDs? did you consider typing > > routing domains in addition to network addresses? > > I am a bit confused - in my mind "RD" and "AS" describe > pretty much similar thing. Its just a matter of the number of bits. There are still more electrons in the universe than covered by the AS number space. :-) Besides, on a BGP/IDRP border (in case anyone ever uses IDRP) you'd need the additional bits to carry an IDRP RD. > Yakov. Curtis
- Re: BGP-4+ Yakov Rekhter
- Re: BGP-4+ Susan Hares
- Re: BGP-4+ Susan Hares
- Re: BGP-4+ John W. Stewart III
- Re: BGP-4+ Yakov Rekhter
- Re: BGP-4+ John W. Stewart III
- Re: BGP-4+ Yakov Rekhter
- Re: BGP-4+ Yakov Rekhter
- Re: BGP-4+ Brandon Black
- Re: BGP-4+ John W. Stewart III
- Re: BGP-4+ Dorian R. Kim
- Re: BGP-4+ Yakov Rekhter
- Re: BGP-4+ Tony Bates
- BGP-4+ Dave Katz
- Re: BGP-4+ Dimitry Haskin
- Re: BGP-4+ John W. Stewart III
- Re: BGP-4+ Brad Smith
- Re: BGP-4+ Dorian R. Kim
- Re: BGP-4+ bmanning
- Re: BGP-4+ Tony Li
- Re: BGP-4+ Brad Smith
- Re: BGP-4+ Dorian R. Kim
- Re: BGP-4+ Brad Smith
- Re: BGP-4+ Curtis Villamizar
- Re: BGP-4+ Curtis Villamizar
- Re: BGP-4+ Curtis Villamizar
- Re: BGP-4+ Curtis Villamizar
- Re: BGP-4+ Dennis Ferguson
- Re: BGP-4+ Brandon Black
- Re: BGP-4+ Yakov Rekhter
- Re: BGP-4+ Dennis Ferguson
- Re: BGP-4+ John W. Stewart III
- Re: BGP-4+ Yakov Rekhter
- Re: BGP-4+ Yakov Rekhter
- Re: BGP-4+ John W. Stewart III
- Re: BGP-4+ Yakov Rekhter
- Re: BGP-4+ Geert Jan de Groot
- Re: BGP-4+ Brad Smith
- Re: BGP-4+ [QOS et al] John G. Scudder
- Re: BGP-4+ Paul Traina