Re: Notes from 3/5/96 working group meeting

"Howard C. Berkowitz" <hcb@clark.net> Wed, 06 March 1996 22:24 UTC

Received: from ietf.cnri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa16776; 6 Mar 96 17:24 EST
Received: from CNRI.Reston.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id ab16772; 6 Mar 96 17:24 EST
Received: from p-o.ans.net by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa13066; 6 Mar 96 17:24 EST
Received: by p-o.ans.net id AA22686 (5.65c/IDA-1.4.4 for bgp-outgoing); Wed, 6 Mar 1996 21:55:48 GMT
X-Sender: hcb@mail.clark.net
Message-Id: <v01520d02ad63b8253814@[130.128.2.14]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Date: Wed, 6 Mar 1996 13:51:41 -0800
To: bgp@ans.net
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: "Howard C. Berkowitz" <hcb@clark.net>
Subject: Re: Notes from 3/5/96 working group meeting
Cc: bgp@ans.net
X-Orig-Sender: bgp-owner@ans.net
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: bgp@ans.net

>
>
>Fun quotes:
>
>        "You forced this @#* MIB down my throat."
>        "Standards don't matter if the code is running
>         in all the routers"

You missed,

         "What's wrong with making it an experimental RFC?  The Internet is
experimental."