Re: Type Codes for IANA

Paul Traina <pst@cisco.com> Wed, 19 July 1995 10:29 UTC

Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa07986; 19 Jul 95 6:29 EDT
Received: from CNRI.Reston.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa07982; 19 Jul 95 6:29 EDT
Received: from interlock.ans.net by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa05787; 19 Jul 95 6:28 EDT
Received: by interlock.ans.net id AA51170 (InterLock SMTP Gateway 3.0 for iwg-out@ans.net); Wed, 19 Jul 1995 05:49:36 -0400
Message-Id: <199507190949.AA51170@interlock.ans.net>
Received: by interlock.ans.net (Protected-side Proxy Mail Agent-2); Wed, 19 Jul 1995 05:49:36 -0400
Received: by interlock.ans.net (Protected-side Proxy Mail Agent-1); Wed, 19 Jul 1995 05:49:36 -0400
To: jkrawczy@baynetworks.com
Cc: Bill Manning <bmanning@isi.edu>, bgp@ans.net, rchandra@cisco.com, haskin@baynetworks.com
Subject: Re: Type Codes for IANA
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 18 Jul 1995 11:21:19 EDT." <199507181521.AA12182@interlock.ans.net>
Date: Wed, 19 Jul 1995 02:49:30 -0700
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: Paul Traina <pst@cisco.com>

I believe Dimitry's advertiser attribute and Ravi's originator attribute are
the exact same bit of information and are compatible.  Ravi? Dimitry?

Paul

  From: jkrawczy@BayNetworks.com (John Krawczyk)
  Subject: Re: Type Codes for IANA 
  Here's what Dimitry used in the RS draft; Hopefully, he'll correct
  anything I screw up here...
  
  This reminds me - we need to do the same administrivia with OPEN
  options and new messages (both of which are defined in the RS draft).
  
  As I said in the meeting, Dimitry grabbed numbers from the high end of
  the scale (255).  Just pick n+1 from the other list for the assigned
  number.
  
  	ADVERTISER path attribute
  
  	CLUSTER ID open parameter
  
  	LIST message
  
  I think that's it.
  
  -jj