IETF Logo Mail Archive

RFC1771

deane@cs.utk.edu Thu, 26 June 1997 16:37 UTC

Received: from cnri by ietf.org id aa10502; 26 Jun 97 12:37 EDT
Received: from merit.edu (merit.edu [198.108.1.42]) by cnri.reston.va.us (8.8.5/8.7.3) with ESMTPid MAA07639 for <ietf-archive@cnri.reston.va.us>; Thu, 26 Jun 1997 12:36:42 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from majordom@localhost) by merit.edu (8.8.5/8.8.5) id KAA26681 for idr-outgoing; Thu, 26 Jun 1997 10:07:49 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from interlock.ans.net (interlock.ans.net [147.225.5.5]) by merit.edu (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id KAA26674 for <bgp@merit.edu>; Thu, 26 Jun 1997 10:07:44 -0400 (EDT)
From: deane@cs.utk.edu
Received: by interlock.ans.net id AA01793 (InterLock SMTP Gateway 3.0 for bgp@ans.net); Thu, 26 Jun 1997 10:07:41 -0400
Received: by interlock.ans.net (Internal Mail Agent-1); Thu, 26 Jun 1997 10:07:41 -0400
Date: Thu, 26 Jun 1997 10:07:40 -0400
Message-Id: <199706261407.KAA00140@duncan.cs.utk.edu>
To: bgp@ans.net
Subject: RFC1771
Cc: deane@cs.utk.edu
Sender: owner-idr@merit.edu
Precedence: bulk

Dear Authors, I am a grad student assigned to do a report on BGP.  My main resource
is RFC1771.  I am attempting to diagram the finite state machine for BGP.  On
page 30 of RFC171, in the discussion of Connect State, the following appears:

     Start event is ignored in the Active State.

I am assuming this sentence should be:

     Start event is ignored in the Connect State.

Is this assumption correct.

     Thank you for an extremely helpful document (RFC1771).  I am not an "expert" in
this material and your explanations are detailed enough to get me off the ground 
floor and write the material for my talk.

Respectfully,
Cricket Haygood Deane

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email