Re: Question on CIDR
Paul Traina <pst@cisco.com> Wed, 25 October 1995 22:22 UTC
Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa20610;
25 Oct 95 18:22 EDT
Received: from CNRI.Reston.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa20606;
25 Oct 95 18:22 EDT
Received: from interlock.ans.net by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa20535;
25 Oct 95 18:22 EDT
Received: by interlock.ans.net id AA02331
(InterLock SMTP Gateway 3.0 for iwg-out@ans.net);
Wed, 25 Oct 1995 18:07:47 -0400
Message-Id: <199510252207.AA02331@interlock.ans.net>
Received: by interlock.ans.net (Protected-side Proxy Mail Agent-2);
Wed, 25 Oct 1995 18:07:47 -0400
Received: by interlock.ans.net (Protected-side Proxy Mail Agent-1);
Wed, 25 Oct 1995 18:07:47 -0400
To: Radha Gowda <rxg@proteon.com>
Cc: bgp@ans.net
Subject: Re: Question on CIDR
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 25 Oct 1995 17:45:07 EDT."
<199510252145.AA01308@interlock.ans.net>
Date: Wed, 25 Oct 1995 15:07:41 -0700
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: Paul Traina <pst@cisco.com>
Yes. It is completely valid. Did you miss the entire net 39 discussion? From: rxg@proteon.com (Radha Gowda) Subject: Question on CIDR Are the ISPs allowed to allocate a range of addresses within a network to different ASs? Rather, is the following configuration valid in real networks? Thanks! AS1 AS2 AS3 10.2.0.0/16 <------> 20.0.0.0/8 <------> 10.3.0.0/16
- Question on CIDR Radha Gowda
- Re: Question on CIDR Tony Li
- Re: Question on CIDR Paul Traina