IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: ASN draft

Tony Bates <Tony.Bates@mci.net> Tue, 07 February 1995 14:32 UTC

Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa01784; 7 Feb 95 9:32 EST
Received: from CNRI.Reston.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa01780; 7 Feb 95 9:32 EST
Received: from interlock.ans.net by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa05534; 7 Feb 95 9:32 EST
Received: by interlock.ans.net id AA58194 (InterLock SMTP Gateway 1.1 for iwg-out@ans.net); Tue, 7 Feb 1995 09:24:20 -0500
Received: by interlock.ans.net (Internal Mail Agent-2); Tue, 7 Feb 1995 09:24:20 -0500
Received: by interlock.ans.net (Internal Mail Agent-1); Tue, 7 Feb 1995 09:24:20 -0500
Message-Id: <199502071424.JAA05218@lovefm.reston.mci.net>
To: Sean Doran <smd@cesium.clock.org>
Cc: bmanning@isi.edu, bgp@ans.net, jhawk@panix.com, pst@cisco.com
Subject: Re: ASN draft
In-Reply-To: Your message of Tue, 07 Feb 1995 06:09:52 PST. <95Feb7.060959pst.6246@cesium.clock.org>
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: Tony Bates <Tony.Bates@mci.net>
X-Phone: +1 703 715 7521
Date: Tue, 07 Feb 1995 09:24:01 -0500
X-Orig-Sender: tony@mci.net

 Sean Doran <smd@cesium.clock.org> writes:
  * | So, we agree here.  The draft should change.
  * 
  * I'm not sure that I do agree.  If you want to read

ditto - comments to follow ;-).

  * things that way, though, be my guest.  It's not something
  * I think of as very important, as these days operations
  * will change interdomain routing reality faster than drafts 
  * can describe it anyway.
  *
Right and this is exaclity what this draft is trying to address. The 
allocation and basic re-definition of the term AS in a practical and
pragmatic (dear I say "real world") way.

		--Tony.

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email