IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: autosys to a PS

Scott Brim <swb1@cornell.edu> Mon, 13 March 1995 15:24 UTC

Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa03354; 13 Mar 95 10:24 EST
Received: from CNRI.Reston.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa03350; 13 Mar 95 10:24 EST
Received: from interlock.ans.net by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa06854; 13 Mar 95 10:24 EST
Received: by interlock.ans.net id AA36565 (InterLock SMTP Gateway 3.0 for iwg-out@ans.net); Mon, 13 Mar 1995 10:12:50 -0500
Message-Id: <199503131512.AA36565@interlock.ans.net>
Received: by interlock.ans.net (Protected-side Proxy Mail Agent-2); Mon, 13 Mar 1995 10:12:50 -0500
Received: by interlock.ans.net (Protected-side Proxy Mail Agent-1); Mon, 13 Mar 1995 10:12:50 -0500
X-Sender: swb1@postoffice3.mail.cornell.edu
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Date: Mon, 13 Mar 1995 10:12:58 -0500
To: yakov@watson.ibm.com
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: Scott Brim <swb1@cornell.edu>
Subject: Re: autosys to a PS
Cc: bgp@ans.net

At 09:46 03/13/95, yakov@watson.ibm.com wrote:
  >Those who think that the draft is too restrictive please
  >plan to present your arguments at the IDR WG meeting in Danvers.

Those who don't think it is too restrictive should also plan to present
their justifications.

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email