Re: autosys to a PS
Peter Lothberg <roll@stupi.se> Tue, 14 March 1995 17:00 UTC
Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa04740;
14 Mar 95 12:00 EST
Received: from CNRI.Reston.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa04736;
14 Mar 95 12:00 EST
Received: from interlock.ans.net by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa08659;
14 Mar 95 12:00 EST
Received: by interlock.ans.net id AA48252
(InterLock SMTP Gateway 3.0 for iwg-out@ans.net);
Tue, 14 Mar 1995 11:46:30 -0500
Message-Id: <199503141646.AA48252@interlock.ans.net>
Received: by interlock.ans.net (Protected-side Proxy Mail Agent-2);
Tue, 14 Mar 1995 11:46:30 -0500
Received: by interlock.ans.net (Protected-side Proxy Mail Agent-1);
Tue, 14 Mar 1995 11:46:30 -0500
Date: Tue, 14 Mar 95 17:45:00 MET
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: Peter Lothberg <roll@stupi.se>
To: Tony Bates <Tony.Bates@mci.net>
Cc: yakov@watson.ibm.com, bmanning@isi.edu, bgp@ans.net
Subject: Re: autosys to a PS
In-Reply-To: Your message of Tue, 14 Mar 1995 11:21:55 -0500
> Can we not go with as is and then move to a new documnet if enough > discussion comes out of the Danvers meeting. There are several people > wanting to reference the document now and asking why the decisions at > San Jose are not being followed through. > --Tony Actually there is more to this. Something must be wrong, if we have serious problem, like flaps or aggregation or getting BGP4 deployed, the only thing that hapens is that we have big discussions on the mailinglists, but no real action is taken in order to get the real problem solved. Here we are again, putting out another possible ticking bomb, atleast I fear real problems down the road with not promoting to use the proper tools. I don't say that we shall waste AS-numbers, but as it stands now, we can't get any at all if we follow that paper to the letter. --Peter
- autosys to a PS yakov
- Re: autosys to a PS Peter Lothberg
- Re: autosys to a PS Sean Doran
- autosys to a PS yakov
- autosys to a PS yakov
- Re: autosys to a PS Mike Nittmann
- Re: autosys to a PS Bill Manning
- autosys to a PS yakov
- Re: autosys to a PS Scott Brim
- Re: autosys to a PS Tony Bates
- Re: autosys to a PS Peter Lothberg
- Re: autosys to a PS Peter Lothberg
- Re: autosys to a PS Tony Bates
- Re: autosys to a PS Peter Lothberg
- autosys to a PS yakov