Re: The same prefix originated within two different ASs
Photon - NOL Staff <photon@dazed.nol.net> Tue, 11 July 1995 17:43 UTC
Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa11148;
11 Jul 95 13:43 EDT
Received: from CNRI.Reston.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa11144;
11 Jul 95 13:43 EDT
Received: from merit.edu by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa12511; 11 Jul 95 13:43 EDT
Received: from tiny.sprintlink.net (tiny.sprintlink.net [199.0.55.90]) by
merit.edu (8.6.12/merit-2.0) with ESMTP id NAA05688 for <bgpd@merit.edu>;
Tue, 11 Jul 1995 13:37:15 -0400
Received: from dazed (photon@dazed.nol.net [204.96.164.2]) by
tiny.sprintlink.net (8.6.9/8.6.9) with SMTP id NAA01432;
Tue, 11 Jul 1995 13:37:10 -0400
Received: by dazed (5.x/SMI-SVR4) id AA05164; Tue, 11 Jul 1995 12:39:13 -0500
Date: Tue, 11 Jul 1995 12:39:05 -0500 (CDT)
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: Photon - NOL Staff <photon@dazed.nol.net>
X-Sender: photon@dazed
To: "Christopher D. Wheeler" <cwheeler@interglobe.com>
Cc: bgp@ans.net, bgpd@merit.edu
Subject: Re: The same prefix originated within two different ASs
In-Reply-To: <199507111613.AA47635@interlock.ans.net>
Message-Id: <Pine.SOL.3.91.950711123149.5143A-100000@dazed>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
On Tue, 11 Jul 1995, Christopher D. Wheeler wrote: > > > Can someone please reiterate to me, from experience, reasons why a prefix > shouldn't be advertised as originating from two separate ASs? I think > this is a bad thing and I understand that by advertising the prefix from > two separate ASs there is no way to distinguish the policies of that > prefix. But, in today's Internet, does anyone have any experience with what > kind of problems this equates to, so that I can forward them on to the > appropriate people. > > I have a site that I am trying to convince that this is a bad thing and I > would like some support. The customer is a dual-homed site to provider A > and provider B, but doesn't want to run BGP (fear of routing protocols I > guess), rather just wants their prefixes advertised in both provider A and > provider B ASs. > > Thanks. > > -Chris > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Christopher D. Wheeler INTERNET: cwheeler@interglobe.com > interGlobe Networks, Inc. OFFICE: 206.329.9266 > 1711 E. Olive Way, Suite 402 FAX: 206.860.7821 > Seattle, WA 98102 INFO: info@interglobe.com > URL: http://www.interglobe.com > > If you just need a reason to convince your customer, then routing symmetry is probably your best answer. If providers A and B both announce the customers network, when provider C needs to send a packet to the network in question (Provider C is some distant network with no direct connections to A or B), there is no clear way determine which path to take. The benefits of and desirablilty of routing symmetry have been outlined in numerous places by numerous people. For that matter, how is this customer planning to do their own routing over two links without using BGP or something similar? Are they default routing to provider A and doing a large amount of static routes to the customers of provider B? Really, the idea of them _not_ using an intelligent routing protocol in this situation seems silly. Brandon .-------------------------------- ------ ----- ---- --- -- - - - - | _____ _______ __ | |___ \ |_____ \ |__| Brandon Lee Black . | __ \ \ __ \ : __ . | --==| |=| || |==| || |==] TCP/IP Networking - Unix Admin [=====-- : : | | | |: `\/' :| :---. : : |__| |__| \______/ |______| Photon | . Networks On-Line | . photon@nol.net | - - - -- --- ---- ----- ------ --------------------------------'
- The same prefix originated within two different A… Christopher D. Wheeler
- The same prefix originated within two different A… Christopher D. Wheeler
- Re: The same prefix originated within two differe… Photon - NOL Staff
- Re: The same prefix originated within two differe… Photon - NOL Staff
- Re: The same prefix originated within two differe… Tony Bates
- Re: The same prefix originated within two differe… Tony Bates
- Re: The same prefix originated within two differe… Vadim Antonov
- Re: The same prefix originated within two differe… Vadim Antonov
- Re: The same prefix originated within two differe… Alan Barrett
- Re: The same prefix originated within two differe… Alan Barrett