autosys to a PS
yakov@watson.ibm.com Fri, 10 March 1995 18:41 UTC
Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa09443;
10 Mar 95 13:41 EST
Received: from CNRI.Reston.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa09439;
10 Mar 95 13:41 EST
Received: from interlock.ans.net by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa11308;
10 Mar 95 13:41 EST
Received: by interlock.ans.net id AA37401
(InterLock SMTP Gateway 3.0 for iwg-out@ans.net);
Fri, 10 Mar 1995 13:23:36 -0500
Message-Id: <199503101823.AA37401@interlock.ans.net>
Received: by interlock.ans.net (Protected-side Proxy Mail Agent-2);
Fri, 10 Mar 1995 13:23:36 -0500
Received: by interlock.ans.net (Protected-side Proxy Mail Agent-1);
Fri, 10 Mar 1995 13:23:36 -0500
Date: Fri, 10 Mar 95 13:17:44 EST
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: yakov@watson.ibm.com
To: smd@cesium.clock.org, roll@stupi.se
Cc: bgp@ans.net
Subject: autosys to a PS
Ref: Your note of Fri, 10 Mar 1995 09:39:28 -0800 Folks, Today I sent an e-mail to the Routing AD (Joel Halpern) asking him to advance the document to a Proposed Standard. If there is a strong desire to hold this off till the IDR WG meeting in April, I can perhaps ask him to put this request on hold. Otherwise, the document will go through the Last Call procedures, and at that point anyone who disagrees with the document would have a last chance to influence the process. Yakov. P.S. Just to remind you, we operate based on the "rough consensus" principle.
- autosys to a PS yakov
- Re: autosys to a PS Peter Lothberg
- Re: autosys to a PS Sean Doran
- autosys to a PS yakov
- autosys to a PS yakov
- Re: autosys to a PS Mike Nittmann
- Re: autosys to a PS Bill Manning
- autosys to a PS yakov
- Re: autosys to a PS Scott Brim
- Re: autosys to a PS Tony Bates
- Re: autosys to a PS Peter Lothberg
- Re: autosys to a PS Peter Lothberg
- Re: autosys to a PS Tony Bates
- Re: autosys to a PS Peter Lothberg
- autosys to a PS yakov