IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Wanted: one more well-known BGP community

Paul Traina <pst@cisco.com> Wed, 09 August 1995 23:03 UTC

Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa21518; 9 Aug 95 19:03 EDT
Received: from CNRI.Reston.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa21514; 9 Aug 95 19:03 EDT
Received: from interlock.ans.net by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa21835; 9 Aug 95 19:03 EDT
Received: by interlock.ans.net id AA04201 (InterLock SMTP Gateway 3.0 for iwg-out@ans.net); Wed, 9 Aug 1995 18:42:40 -0400
Message-Id: <199508092242.AA04201@interlock.ans.net>
Received: by interlock.ans.net (Protected-side Proxy Mail Agent-2); Wed, 9 Aug 1995 18:42:40 -0400
Received: by interlock.ans.net (Protected-side Proxy Mail Agent-1); Wed, 9 Aug 1995 18:42:40 -0400
To: Vince Fuller <vaf@valinor.barrnet.net>
Cc: bgp@ans.net
Subject: Re: Wanted: one more well-known BGP community
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 09 Aug 1995 15:33:26 PDT." <199508092232.AA63945@interlock.ans.net>
Date: Wed, 09 Aug 1995 15:41:20 -0700
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: Paul Traina <pst@cisco.com>

It is an internet-draft, so it is approrpiate to discuss a flaw in the
protocol here,  but in point of fact the protocol is not flawed.

My point is that a careful reading of the definition would indicate that
no-advertise already does exactly what you want of it...rather we just
weren't consistent,  since neighbor-route-maps were added later in
the game as an afterthought.

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email