IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: A proposed change to BGP-4 MIB bgpPeerTable INDEX clause

"John Y. Chu" <jychu@watson.ibm.com> Thu, 19 January 1995 19:55 UTC

Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa07795; 19 Jan 95 14:55 EST
Received: from CNRI.Reston.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa07791; 19 Jan 95 14:55 EST
Received: from interlock.ans.net by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa12891; 19 Jan 95 14:55 EST
Received: by interlock.ans.net id AA21298 (InterLock SMTP Gateway 1.1 for iwg-out@ans.net); Thu, 19 Jan 1995 14:46:25 -0500
Received: by interlock.ans.net (Internal Mail Agent-5); Thu, 19 Jan 1995 14:46:25 -0500
Received: by interlock.ans.net (Internal Mail Agent-4); Thu, 19 Jan 1995 14:46:25 -0500
Received: by interlock.ans.net (Internal Mail Agent-3); Thu, 19 Jan 1995 14:46:25 -0500
Received: by interlock.ans.net (Internal Mail Agent-2); Thu, 19 Jan 1995 14:46:25 -0500
Received: by interlock.ans.net (Internal Mail Agent-1); Thu, 19 Jan 1995 14:46:25 -0500
Date: Thu, 19 Jan 1995 14:46:16 -0500
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: "John Y. Chu" <jychu@watson.ibm.com>
Message-Id: <9501191946.AA32844@triton.watson.ibm.com>
To: Robert Snyder <snyder@cisco.com>
Cc: bgp@ans.net
Subject: Re: A proposed change to BGP-4 MIB bgpPeerTable INDEX clause
In-Reply-To: Your message of Thu, 19 Jan 95 11:34:57 PST. <199501191934.LAA25297@hubbub.cisco.com>


>The proposal is illegal.
>
>You can not add an Index to an existing table.
>
>The only way you could do this is to deprecate the existing table and
>create a new one.

	
	Robert,
	Let's discuss the merit of this change first.

	Once a consensus is reached, if needed, we will with the
	procedures then.

	John

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email