IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: ASN draft

Paul Traina <pst@cisco.com> Tue, 07 February 1995 19:15 UTC

Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa05919; 7 Feb 95 14:15 EST
Received: from CNRI.Reston.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa05915; 7 Feb 95 14:15 EST
Received: from interlock.ans.net by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa10943; 7 Feb 95 14:15 EST
Received: by interlock.ans.net id AA35404 (InterLock SMTP Gateway 1.1 for iwg-out@ans.net); Tue, 7 Feb 1995 14:03:19 -0500
Received: by interlock.ans.net (Internal Mail Agent-2); Tue, 7 Feb 1995 14:03:19 -0500
Received: by interlock.ans.net (Internal Mail Agent-1); Tue, 7 Feb 1995 14:03:19 -0500
Message-Id: <199502071903.LAA21796@feta.cisco.com>
X-Authentication-Warning: feta.cisco.com: Host localhost.cisco.com didn't use HELO protocol
To: bmanning@isi.edu
Cc: Sean Doran <smd@cesium.clock.org>, bgp@ans.net, jhawk@panix.com, tony@mci.net
Subject: Re: ASN draft
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 07 Feb 1995 10:36:27 PST." <199502071836.AA04530@zed.isi.edu>
Date: Tue, 07 Feb 1995 11:03:11 -0800
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: Paul Traina <pst@cisco.com>

  From: bmanning@ISI.EDU
  Subject: Re: ASN draft

  So when do we run out of "nerd-knobs" and need to jump to another protocol?
  (My gratuitious vector off the topic :)

As long as the protocol can be extended cleanly, why switch?

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email