Re: autosys to a PS

[Tony Bates <[e-mail]>]

 [e-mail] writes:
  * Ref:  Your note of Sat, 11 Mar 1995 08:18:38 -0800 (PST)
  * 
  * >The draft as it is is too restrictive....
  * 
  * Folks,
  * 
  * Those who think that the draft is too restrictive please
  * plan to present your arguments at the IDR WG meeting in Danvers.
  * 
  * Yakov.

Yakov,
	this is fine. However, I will point out that Bill has already
put his points to the list and consensus seems to suggest we are done
with them and I did make a change to accomadate part of his problem and
also that Peter Lothberg (the only other person having problems with
this) was actioned with a deadline to write the additional text he
wanted to see in the doc.

To quote from the minutes:

...
Concern was expressed relative to this document and its lack of text on
where AS numbers should be used, so that less knowledgeable service
providers do not read this draft the wrong way and try to stop using AS
numbers in their networks.  Peter Lothberg will write some text.

The goal is to have a new version of this document by 14 January 1995.
The consensus of the working group was to advance it as a Proposed
Standard.
...

Can we not go with as is and then move to a new documnet if enough
discussion comes out of the Danvers meeting. There are several people
wanting to reference the document now and asking why the decisions at
San Jose are not being followed through.

		--Tony