Re: Guidelines for AS numbers

Bill Manning <bmanning@isi.edu> Wed, 01 February 1995 18:10 UTC

Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa05640; 1 Feb 95 13:10 EST
Received: from CNRI.Reston.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa05636; 1 Feb 95 13:10 EST
Received: from interlock.ans.net by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa10129; 1 Feb 95 13:10 EST
Received: by interlock.ans.net id AA46881 (InterLock SMTP Gateway 1.1 for iwg-out@ans.net); Wed, 1 Feb 1995 12:52:31 -0500
Received: by interlock.ans.net (Internal Mail Agent-2); Wed, 1 Feb 1995 12:52:31 -0500
Received: by interlock.ans.net (Internal Mail Agent-1); Wed, 1 Feb 1995 12:52:31 -0500
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: Bill Manning <bmanning@isi.edu>
Message-Id: <199502011752.AA29289@zephyr.isi.edu>
Subject: Re: Guidelines for AS numbers
To: yakov@watson.ibm.com
Date: Wed, 1 Feb 1995 09:52:24 -0800 (PST)
Cc: bgp@ans.net
In-Reply-To: <199502011338.AA50073@interlock.ans.net> from "yakov@watson.ibm.com" at Feb 1, 95 08:38:43 am
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Length: 281

I had made several commens directly to John Hawkins which have not been
reflected in any revised draft.  I'll go through the archives and find
them.  As it stands, this draft has serious problems with some basic 
definitions and should not be allowed to proceed as is.
-- 
--bill