Re: load-sharing/load-balancing 2 T1s (fwd)

Erik Sherk <sherk@uunet.uu.net> Fri, 08 March 1996 17:06 UTC

Received: from ietf.cnri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa14972; 8 Mar 96 12:06 EST
Received: from CNRI.Reston.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa14968; 8 Mar 96 12:06 EST
Received: from p-o.ans.net by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa09698; 8 Mar 96 12:06 EST
Received: by p-o.ans.net id AA12504 (5.65c/IDA-1.4.4 for bgp-outgoing); Fri, 8 Mar 1996 16:25:14 GMT
Message-Id: <QQageb19975.199603081625@esherk.uu.net>
To: bgp@ans.net
Subject: Re: load-sharing/load-balancing 2 T1s (fwd)
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 08 Mar 1996 07:26:05 PST." <199603081526.AA19205@zed.isi.edu>
Date: Fri, 08 Mar 1996 11:25:05 -0500
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: Erik Sherk <sherk@uunet.uu.net>
X-Orig-Sender: bgp-owner@ans.net
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: bgp@ans.net

> > Subject: Re: load-sharing/load-balancing 2 T1s
> > 
> > Yes, as I sit looking at our DS-3 and our now somewhat useless DS-1's (try
> > load balancing across links that differ in size by a factor of 30), I sit
> > here and wish that there was an Exterior Gateway Protocol of some sort that
> > did costing of links like OSPF does, but, Alas, there isn't.  Anyone want to
> > implement one? :)
> > 
> > At 03:09 PM 3/7/96 -0500, you wrote:
> > >This becomes an issue just a tad more complicated than 'tweaking the
> > >routing'.  :-)
> > >
> > >You will, of course, have to run BGP if you are not already doing so.
> > >Insofar as BGP does not 'do' load-balancing, it becomes an exercise for
> > >the reader to figure out how to manually direct specific portions of
> > >internal traffic in a distributed fashion across multiple external gateways.
> > >
> > >- paul
> 
> 
> 	A cry from the community!
> 
> 
> -- 
> --bill

Yes, let me second the cry. Why does BGP pick only one route when
it has several options? Load spliting would be a valuable tool.

Erik