IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Last Call: Definitions of Managed Objects for the Fourth Version

Marshall Rose <mrose@dbc.mtview.ca.us> Wed, 06 December 1995 16:19 UTC

Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa12917; 6 Dec 95 11:19 EST
Received: from CNRI.Reston.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa12913; 6 Dec 95 11:19 EST
Received: from [147.225.5.2] by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa10514; 6 Dec 95 11:19 EST
Received: by interlock.ans.net id AA03204 (InterLock SMTP Gateway 3.0 for iwg-out@ans.net); Wed, 6 Dec 1995 10:56:21 -0500
Message-Id: <199512061556.AA03204@interlock.ans.net>
Received: by interlock.ans.net (Protected-side Proxy Mail Agent-2); Wed, 6 Dec 1995 10:56:21 -0500
Received: by interlock.ans.net (Protected-side Proxy Mail Agent-1); Wed, 6 Dec 1995 10:56:21 -0500
To: Paul Traina <pst@cisco.com>
Cc: "Jeffrey T. Johnson" <jjohnson@cisco.com>, iesg@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US, bgp@ans.net, ietf@CNRI.Reston.VA.US
Reply-To: ietf@CNRI.Reston.VA.US
Subject: Re: Last Call: Definitions of Managed Objects for the Fourth Version
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 05 Dec 1995 19:52:10 PST." <199512060352.TAA05532@puli.cisco.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Id: <16732.818265250.1@dbc.mtview.ca.us>
Date: Wed, 06 Dec 1995 09:54:10 -0600
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: Marshall Rose <mrose@dbc.mtview.ca.us>

> Given the current state of affairs in that area, it seems like we need to
> do seems to be to eliminate the SNMPv2 boilerplate and framework entirely
> and replace the MIB notification section with one that is based upon native
> SNMPv1 identifiers.  All of this is basicly mechanical translation of text.

alternatively, one could show up at the thursday night plenary to hear a
discussion of "the current state of affairs" in SNMPv2... (there are, of
course, other solutions than simply throwing everything out; further,
bgp is not the only working group with a mib effected...)

/mtr

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email