IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Draft changes

Curtis Villamizar <curtis@ans.net> Sat, 19 October 1996 00:51 UTC

Received: from cnri by ietf.org id aa11900; 18 Oct 96 20:51 EDT
Received: from merit.edu by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa25934; 18 Oct 96 20:51 EDT
Received: (from daemon@localhost) by merit.edu (8.7.6/merit-2.0) id UAA08645 for idr-outgoing; Fri, 18 Oct 1996 20:18:20 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from interlock.ans.net (interlock.ans.net [147.225.5.5]) by merit.edu (8.7.6/merit-2.0) with SMTP id UAA08640 for <bgp@merit.edu>; Fri, 18 Oct 1996 20:18:18 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by interlock.ans.net id AA19110 (InterLock SMTP Gateway 3.0 for bgp@ans.net); Fri, 18 Oct 1996 20:18:16 -0400
Received: by interlock.ans.net (Internal Mail Agent-1); Fri, 18 Oct 1996 20:18:16 -0400
Message-Id: <199610190017.UAA01890@brookfield.ans.net>
To: Tony Li <tli@jnx.com>
Cc: bgp@ans.net
Reply-To: curtis@ans.net
Subject: Re: Draft changes
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Thu, 17 Oct 1996 13:51:39 PDT." <199610172051.NAA19995@chimp.jnx.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Oct 1996 20:17:32 -0400
From: Curtis Villamizar <curtis@ans.net>
Sender: owner-idr@merit.edu
Precedence: bulk

Hi Tony,

Just a quick scan of the diffs for now.  1) I though it was still
discretionary becasue to be mandatory it must be required for both
IBGP and EBGP as stated in another diff chunk.  2) I really don't like
your pseudocode description of route selection and I'd rather see a
more consise description.  I'll read the whole draft and see how it
fits together.  Here are some comments for now.

I think there was consensus on other changes so I'll go through the
mail and resend the changes so we can discuss them again, particularly
ones that got positive comments.

Curtis


> ***************
> *** 3223,3229 ****
>   3260 Jay St.
>   Santa Clara, CA 95051
>   (408) 327-1906
> ! email: tli@jnx.com
>   .fi
>   .sp
>   
> --- 3244,3250 ----
>   3260 Jay St.
>   Santa Clara, CA 95051
>   (408) 327-1906
> ! email: tli@juniper.net
>   .fi
>   .sp

.net ?

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email