Re: Question on CIDR
Tony Li <tli@cisco.com> Wed, 25 October 1995 22:10 UTC
Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa20429;
25 Oct 95 18:10 EDT
Received: from CNRI.Reston.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa20419;
25 Oct 95 18:10 EDT
Received: from interlock.ans.net by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa20323;
25 Oct 95 18:10 EDT
Received: by interlock.ans.net id AA01915
(InterLock SMTP Gateway 3.0 for iwg-out@ans.net);
Wed, 25 Oct 1995 17:58:39 -0400
Message-Id: <199510252158.AA01915@interlock.ans.net>
Received: by interlock.ans.net (Protected-side Proxy Mail Agent-2);
Wed, 25 Oct 1995 17:58:39 -0400
Received: by interlock.ans.net (Protected-side Proxy Mail Agent-1);
Wed, 25 Oct 1995 17:58:39 -0400
Date: Wed, 25 Oct 1995 14:58:34 -0700
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: Tony Li <tli@cisco.com>
To: rxg@proteon.com
Cc: bgp@ans.net
In-Reply-To: <199510252145.AA01308@interlock.ans.net> (rxg@proteon.com)
Subject: Re: Question on CIDR
Are the ISPs allowed to allocate a range of addresses within a network
to different ASs? Rather, is the following configuration valid in real
networks? Thanks!
AS1 AS2 AS3
10.2.0.0/16 <------> 20.0.0.0/8 <------> 10.3.0.0/16
Yes, certainly. Of course, those exact assignments would have other
problems... ;-)
Tony
- Question on CIDR Radha Gowda
- Re: Question on CIDR Tony Li
- Re: Question on CIDR Paul Traina