Re: [Bier] comments on draft-pfister-bier-mld-00

Stig Venaas <stig@venaas.com> Wed, 01 March 2017 17:57 UTC

Return-Path: <stig@venaas.com>
X-Original-To: bier@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: bier@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D00B9129632 for <bier@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 1 Mar 2017 09:57:36 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=venaas-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id KrhuxSGNlxEV for <bier@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 1 Mar 2017 09:57:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-yw0-x235.google.com (mail-yw0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c05::235]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1E1C7129621 for <bier@ietf.org>; Wed, 1 Mar 2017 09:57:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-yw0-x235.google.com with SMTP id s15so15993036ywg.0 for <bier@ietf.org>; Wed, 01 Mar 2017 09:57:35 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=venaas-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=RoiNXXMPZ2Vvt3jzP2htdQoMTxVb+Nqb0x+5BurVkag=; b=KUzzbda8dkKQx1tQMb9tteaZ4Yryl9q5/Q5gprAQHcFRxWNGPcvrFg6z6BKf2ImDeM reXol4HOHdIaihoykIGrWUM3TWV+yQWor5azV5kgCYE9BGmeB7yDHteaEBKRYbSXnHY3 GtsehkMrObvWJB9EsbmykraC1G9We1dmIuanICNqQw3fEpgEghgBPQaKPP+D0XCxDSLk NqCEUSFptEQbzYJCJJG33hhliiyd1JHBVRf2QFdlNF1thHHUe7qyiGguozJ3Ukbwj7fV dYnYtf5wY8DHV8Qn14ghkmtMTedsx/pSA8PqGyAhCeY8U6CaJ/PKE2je/Td4UubOA4eI Vw+w==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=RoiNXXMPZ2Vvt3jzP2htdQoMTxVb+Nqb0x+5BurVkag=; b=c7aK90W+CCO8wH9zKgB7HCtLsR3Ru3ZicCRvPxptp16xzxSGJi1OkoG1FylGCvYRlO rXV+GtG3G3suXDAsAwAxMABK6uBQ6562R2d1Yd1lAxIPDT4M3cPIYseNgQaTxz2fj593 fkMxWZtRM8AqoWADb1+RXhnEHRS00LJvGhpcfQQvU/I2v1V9+lEOlm+4WYTEXxgxkore 90H1uoM95gvgyAbtlxjD2BqgWTGK9HkLuKK7MUCvT+fbhL7/Qi46eR6pwyPVyaSI/L1O 1Ls0r4Yc1IeMpY3fQb+zZ2yXnOwi9IEaP1dAsZ0neX7DikAU1+AKH6U0A+qx65XP9WA/ /Xlg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AMke39mhrCEujmcVyuaVl6Y3y/LJ9kwPDq204BM5V5FblvCa7babaiKJj69/GWf0+t23/QPGWfkpr+o9MJIryw==
X-Received: by 10.200.53.237 with SMTP id l42mr11376372qtb.264.1488391054304; Wed, 01 Mar 2017 09:57:34 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.140.81.166 with HTTP; Wed, 1 Mar 2017 09:57:33 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <2E4BB27CAB87BF43B4207C0E55860F180EAFE8BA@eusaamb103.ericsson.se>
References: <2E4BB27CAB87BF43B4207C0E55860F180EAFE8BA@eusaamb103.ericsson.se>
From: Stig Venaas <stig@venaas.com>
Date: Wed, 01 Mar 2017 09:57:33 -0800
Message-ID: <CAHANBt+DKDo+saZ4h6eubGbb06Y_R5Gq3mba7N_M6H1o-8rs_A@mail.gmail.com>
To: Antoni Przygienda <antoni.przygienda@ericsson.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bier/0iaw4xdGRHI35m_pi2FqdLs8fLw>
Cc: "bier@ietf.org" <bier@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Bier] comments on draft-pfister-bier-mld-00
X-BeenThere: bier@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "\"Bit Indexed Explicit Replication discussion list\"" <bier.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/bier>, <mailto:bier-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/bier/>
List-Post: <mailto:bier@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bier-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bier>, <mailto:bier-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Mar 2017 17:57:37 -0000

Hi

Sorry for not seeing this earlier.

Depending on the implementation, it may be easier to implement if the
host stack on the router listens to the multicast group that the IGMP
packet is sent to. I think one easy option to just use the regular
IGMP/MLD group. This requires the least change in implementations.

Stig


On Sat, Oct 31, 2015 at 4:56 AM, Antoni Przygienda
<antoni.przygienda@ericsson.com> wrote:
> Only one suggestion, I think the ‘MUST be configured with all ‘BMLD … nodes’
> is maybe unnecessarily restrictive, a SHOULD would serve the purpose with
> “otherwise, set all the bits in the sub-domain and send BIER packet that
> way”.
>
>
>
> I would assume that the amount of query/reports is neglectible compared to
> the flows themselves and such ‘broadcast option’ could make deployments
> easier.
>
>
>
> thanks
>
>
>
> --- tony
>
>
>
> “Your work is to discover your work and then with all your heart to give
> yourself to it.” --- Buddha
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> BIER mailing list
> BIER@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bier
>