IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Bier] Pre-IETF98 Work

"Nagendra Kumar Nainar (naikumar)" <naikumar@cisco.com> Wed, 11 January 2017 07:46 UTC

Return-Path: <naikumar@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: bier@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: bier@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6CCB129A57 for <bier@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 10 Jan 2017 23:46:20 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -17.72
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-17.72 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-3.199, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8GikXGl4-D3w for <bier@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 10 Jan 2017 23:46:19 -0800 (PST)
Received: from alln-iport-4.cisco.com (alln-iport-4.cisco.com [173.37.142.91]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 18F7A129A4E for <bier@ietf.org>; Tue, 10 Jan 2017 23:46:19 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=8822; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1484120778; x=1485330378; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=iw195NkSD3k6h8OwoeEDU7/9gIHOMVIN1huAiyytyiQ=; b=G7q7vXS7gSY4hFaVgTpOjBRQYWhtiVgD/PqgP3APoCKgS78X3X0NUEEm F6OSSu1eUzgJEY2wp8OqbJcZ/kjfhxwCLZCunTxGMJ71EOUObLJc4Vu9I 7RRL7dNvQwN1jWUHqICjwSXcrQvxEmw7oZ3U/fWmwkzGCUL25zuibYhZE Q=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0AcAQBX4nVY/4cNJK1dGQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBBwEBAQEBgnFKAQEBAQEfX4ENB41QkieHf4d9hSuCCx8BCoV4AoIKPxQBAgEBAQEBAQFjKIRpAQEBBAEBbAsQAgEIEQECAQIoByEGCxQDBggCBAENBYhlAxgOslKHQg2CSAEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBARgFiyaCToIYhUYFmnE4AYZahniDf4F3hQyDTYYVig2IUwEfOIFBFTqDfIIzc4dZgQ0BAQE
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.33,345,1477958400"; d="scan'208,217";a="370304830"
Received: from alln-core-2.cisco.com ([173.36.13.135]) by alln-iport-4.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 11 Jan 2017 07:46:18 +0000
Received: from XCH-RCD-013.cisco.com (xch-rcd-013.cisco.com [173.37.102.23]) by alln-core-2.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id v0B7kIXq019113 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Wed, 11 Jan 2017 07:46:18 GMT
Received: from xch-rcd-015.cisco.com (173.37.102.25) by XCH-RCD-013.cisco.com (173.37.102.23) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1210.3; Wed, 11 Jan 2017 01:46:17 -0600
Received: from xch-rcd-015.cisco.com ([173.37.102.25]) by XCH-RCD-015.cisco.com ([173.37.102.25]) with mapi id 15.00.1210.000; Wed, 11 Jan 2017 01:46:17 -0600
From: "Nagendra Kumar Nainar (naikumar)" <naikumar@cisco.com>
To: Greg Mirsky <gregimirsky@gmail.com>, Greg Shepherd <gjshep@gmail.com>
Thread-Topic: [Bier] Pre-IETF98 Work
Thread-Index: AQHSa3UfaAtWB3NTyUea8c8pg2PUvqEzCzwA///sLYA=
Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2017 07:46:17 +0000
Message-ID: <D49B4CD9.1C6D01%naikumar@cisco.com>
References: <CABFReBr28gGCd+gm0fATYDugYtdW5JJnu30RUBg035hS6Z44_A@mail.gmail.com> <CA+RyBmUf+uDyk4PS74jKaWd5iXSdRMS1y4M+DPxBCp6x0pd1Ng@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CA+RyBmUf+uDyk4PS74jKaWd5iXSdRMS1y4M+DPxBCp6x0pd1Ng@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.7.0.161029
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.82.221.109]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_D49B4CD91C6D01naikumarciscocom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bier/3h0WFRrqa6jhTBFPJqg_QAtPbVA>
Cc: "bier@ietf.org" <bier@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Bier] Pre-IETF98 Work
X-BeenThere: bier@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "\"Bit Indexed Explicit Replication discussion list\"" <bier.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/bier>, <mailto:bier-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/bier/>
List-Post: <mailto:bier@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bier-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bier>, <mailto:bier-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2017 07:46:21 -0000

Hi Greg S,

I will refresh draft-ietf-bier-ping soon.

Thanks,
Nagendra

From: BIER <bier-bounces@ietf.org<mailto:bier-bounces@ietf.org>> on behalf of Greg Mirsky <gregimirsky@gmail.com<mailto:gregimirsky@gmail.com>>
Date: Tuesday, January 10, 2017 at 10:57 PM
To: Greg Shepherd <gjshep@gmail.com<mailto:gjshep@gmail.com>>
Cc: "bier@ietf.org<mailto:bier@ietf.org>" <bier@ietf.org<mailto:bier@ietf.org>>
Subject: Re: [Bier] Pre-IETF98 Work

Hi Greg, et. al,
I'll refresh draft-ietf-bier-pmmm-oam and draft-ietf-bier-path-mtu-discovery shortly.Would WG Chairs consider adding draft-ietf-bier-oam-requirements to the list of candidates?

Regards,
Greg

On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 11:09 AM, Greg Shepherd <gjshep@gmail.com<mailto:gjshep@gmail.com>> wrote:
*,

There are several expiring WG drafts which need to be addressed. Let's take a look at these and see if any of them represent complete work. At our last meeting it was suggested that we potentially have docs which could be advanced to WGLC, but wouldn't have to go into the Editor's Queue yet, pending the WG's completion of the reqs to recharter all of our work into the Proposed Standards track.

I suggest we start with this list of expiring docs to either advance to WGLC or rev/refresh as necessary:

draft-ietf-bier-architecture
draft-ietf-bier-isis-extensions
draft-ietf-bier-ospf-extensions
draft-ietf-bier-ping
draft-ietf-bier-pmmm-oam
draft-ietf-bier-path-mtu-discovery

The MPLS encap draft:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bier-mpls-encapsulation/
..should now represent the consensus on our unified encapsulation. This too could be a candidate for WGLC

MVPN draft was just rev'd:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bier-mvpn/
Please read and respond to the list with any issues.

Thanks,
Chairs
(Greg)



_______________________________________________
BIER mailing list
BIER@ietf.org<mailto:BIER@ietf.org>
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bier

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email