IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Bier] WGLC draft-ietf-bier-architecture-05

Greg Mirsky <gregimirsky@gmail.com> Mon, 08 May 2017 02:19 UTC

Return-Path: <gregimirsky@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: bier@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: bier@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82FD2128BB7 for <bier@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 7 May 2017 19:19:01 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.699
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7wxzMJ1P1RWd for <bier@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 7 May 2017 19:19:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-oi0-x22e.google.com (mail-oi0-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c06::22e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E72A81243F3 for <bier@ietf.org>; Sun, 7 May 2017 19:18:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-oi0-x22e.google.com with SMTP id h4so35898682oib.3 for <bier@ietf.org>; Sun, 07 May 2017 19:18:59 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=XVEbOTaBCXDV4QvjnZ1w3pDaNOfn9P4nh1y9iMGMLME=; b=S9WswnkVncSpN1/qMYjBW++XuI0mAh3dDxSONxAVts4G7fB8/zMY6a2p+K0j7QdMEd B7abN58/XT8KYsYs2qe37knqtgCKmgr085R+xDUSYKrDEIrrlNDXydyX95mw0JfqHHE0 J+gslCyd3l+RUthUMfcASIRJRgpX+jFKUooLcVFzoUiQG3ND7jt5FnQTXj2j8KnbjC/n heTW7/zOKJbpH+WbOzevOANfl/nlNjx31B9H4MXCetEaLiVAshX/0uLnBg2W5N5Mv36z yCRfncXwNfORq3O0AVgA2ZclpCCOMdEeO2XByZ1SSV4VKltnHV/QhG2KX/1OE7QeN3QM uBmQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=XVEbOTaBCXDV4QvjnZ1w3pDaNOfn9P4nh1y9iMGMLME=; b=DodgthaaVTAWgNew72G348IdYggoMFHK1v1kjLM3Y1p7CMuMxVlzwwt0PviOuq1+Vk zEC1ogVhj3OOo6cNoDSDJYv0qxcSQh66HElyQYHZAWphJ5OEjJt1s9D5EMsbGqZbjPFD RVM+cr7T/NLyFae86D+zoaSOwpM+ClBUkrqovJ49CyyFwFP5nvCXhMsnhRGTzkSL6fBm QiFMdPU47cSXT2KEhjGMrQYh1X365PKDvgsGnhcfapLCXqUkNJ6wKnfme9pO2dnHCsCX 9zx/XV8r+uirsx0cx8EpmGxg7pxGeFtrEMg73+TNQpBKA8gj9tOS6l16xgI11l2mpoy0 tK3g==
X-Gm-Message-State: AN3rC/7w71wWGwJXeQN6pTFItO6fdQ+m07U77u++Ll+Oc2UueSqw+9m1 gPxA5OQIIcMQ2YhLkzHKQLL5b1aihg==
X-Received: by 10.157.43.238 with SMTP id u101mr19570662ota.182.1494209939385; Sun, 07 May 2017 19:18:59 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.157.52.246 with HTTP; Sun, 7 May 2017 19:18:59 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CABFReBp-LnmyNV5VjiF4YW+9zqXn7L6WLFKgPr8aEZ88DTEqVQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CABFReBp-LnmyNV5VjiF4YW+9zqXn7L6WLFKgPr8aEZ88DTEqVQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Greg Mirsky <gregimirsky@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 07 May 2017 19:18:59 -0700
Message-ID: <CA+RyBmU2L5TtJbBqB9XtJz3uce8KBCdsDZwBWUixS-zg1peOeA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Greg Shepherd <gjshep@gmail.com>
Cc: "bier@ietf.org" <bier@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a113d0852a8377b054ef9dc1e"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bier/50iZ1H067jtwbu5FtChakncqjwU>
Subject: Re: [Bier] WGLC draft-ietf-bier-architecture-05
X-BeenThere: bier@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "\"Bit Indexed Explicit Replication discussion list\"" <bier.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/bier>, <mailto:bier-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/bier/>
List-Post: <mailto:bier@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bier-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bier>, <mailto:bier-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 May 2017 02:19:01 -0000

yes/support

Regards,
Greg

On Fri, May 5, 2017 at 3:56 PM, Greg Shepherd <gjshep@gmail.com> wrote:

> At WG meeting, IETF97 in Chicago, we decided to move forward to WGLC for
> some of our docs. We learned that even once published the IESG has a
> process to change the track of the RFC if the WG makes the case to move the
> work from Informational to Standards track. The feedback from operators is
> that RFC status was more important than track, and we won't be able to meet
> our charter requirements to change track without deployment experience and
> operator support.
>
> This email starts a two week timer for feedback on the draft:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bier-architecture/
>
> Please read and respond do this thread. EOWGLC - 20/5/17
>
> Thank you,
> Chairs
>
> _______________________________________________
> BIER mailing list
> BIER@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bier
>
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email