IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Bier] WGLC [renewed]: draft-ietf-bier-idr-extensions

zhang.zheng@zte.com.cn Wed, 22 March 2023 07:45 UTC

Return-Path: <zhang.zheng@zte.com.cn>
X-Original-To: bier@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: bier@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 570D5C15152B for <bier@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 22 Mar 2023 00:45:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.895
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.895 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id H5gO2xgZ0TKF for <bier@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 22 Mar 2023 00:45:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mxhk.zte.com.cn (mxhk.zte.com.cn [63.216.63.40]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 11702C14CE52 for <bier@ietf.org>; Wed, 22 Mar 2023 00:45:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mse-fl2.zte.com.cn (unknown [10.5.228.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mxhk.zte.com.cn (FangMail) with ESMTPS id 4PhL9z4BVrz8QrkZ; Wed, 22 Mar 2023 15:45:43 +0800 (CST)
Received: from njb2app07.zte.com.cn ([10.55.22.95]) by mse-fl2.zte.com.cn with SMTP id 32M7jbBP042221; Wed, 22 Mar 2023 15:45:37 +0800 (+08) (envelope-from zhang.zheng@zte.com.cn)
Received: from mapi (njy2app02[null]) by mapi (Zmail) with MAPI id mid203; Wed, 22 Mar 2023 15:45:39 +0800 (CST)
Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2023 15:45:39 +0800
X-Zmail-TransId: 2afa641ab223ffffffff95f-267a4
X-Mailer: Zmail v1.0
Message-ID: <202303221545393167496@zte.com.cn>
In-Reply-To: <CA+wi2hPff-a1+yuz6z=4BeM-Ndy+RYMey05f0anH=jAYPcKhyw@mail.gmail.com>
References: CA+wi2hPff-a1+yuz6z=4BeM-Ndy+RYMey05f0anH=jAYPcKhyw@mail.gmail.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
From: zhang.zheng@zte.com.cn
To: tonysietf@gmail.com
Cc: bier@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="=====_001_next====="
X-MAIL: mse-fl2.zte.com.cn 32M7jbBP042221
X-Fangmail-Gw-Spam-Type: 0
X-FangMail-Miltered: at cgslv5.04-192.168.250.137.novalocal with ID 641AB227.000 by FangMail milter!
X-FangMail-Envelope: 1679471143/4PhL9z4BVrz8QrkZ/641AB227.000/10.5.228.133/[10.5.228.133]/mse-fl2.zte.com.cn/<zhang.zheng@zte.com.cn>
X-Fangmail-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-Fangmail-MID-QID: 641AB227.000/4PhL9z4BVrz8QrkZ
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bier/8kNeN4zzVjcrTI97URFbVV-5wAY>
Subject: Re: [Bier] WGLC [renewed]: draft-ietf-bier-idr-extensions
X-BeenThere: bier@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "\"Bit Indexed Explicit Replication discussion list\"" <bier.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/bier>, <mailto:bier-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/bier/>
List-Post: <mailto:bier@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bier-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bier>, <mailto:bier-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2023 07:45:53 -0000

Have read the newest version and think it can be moved forward.


I am unware any IPR on this draft. 


Thanks,


Sandy














Original



From: TonyPrzygienda <tonysietf@gmail.com>
To: BIER WG <bier@ietf.org>;
Date: 2023年03月06日 22:07
Subject: [Bier] WGLC [renewed]: draft-ietf-bier-idr-extensions




_______________________________________________
BIER mailing list
BIER@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bier


The draft underwent significant brush-up in -08 and -09 version and hence is being last called again. 



LC finishes Mar 24


Ran, please take care of document shepherd writedown/comments as well 



Do we need to ask for external review by IDR as well. AFAIR none has been performed? 



thanks 



-- tony

v2.31.3 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status