Re: [Bier] BIER OAM Document Status Tue, 27 July 2021 21:32 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 738743A08E9; Tue, 27 Jul 2021 14:32:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.894
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.894 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_FONT_FACE_BAD=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pwzIADs8cA9h; Tue, 27 Jul 2021 14:32:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C1A0A3A08D3; Tue, 27 Jul 2021 14:32:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from (unknown []) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTPS id 2700BE8E93A96C52D997; Wed, 28 Jul 2021 05:32:06 +0800 (CST)
Received: from ([]) by with SMTP id 16RLW45Z006754; Wed, 28 Jul 2021 05:32:04 +0800 (GMT-8) (envelope-from
Received: from mapi (mgapp01[null]) by mapi (Zmail) with MAPI id mid81; Wed, 28 Jul 2021 05:32:04 +0800 (CST)
Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2021 05:32:04 +0800
X-Zmail-TransId: 2af961007b54c670b95f
X-Mailer: Zmail v1.0
Message-ID: <>
In-Reply-To: <>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="=====_001_next====="
X-MAIL: 16RLW45Z006754
Archived-At: <>
Subject: Re: [Bier] BIER OAM Document Status
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "\"Bit Indexed Explicit Replication discussion list\"" <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2021 21:32:12 -0000

Hi Alvaro,

many thanks for clarifying the status of the draft.

Hi Tony and Greg,

the draft was updated to address AD review comments. Do you feel these changes need a formal presentation to the WG, or can the draft be moved to the second WG LC?


Greg Mirsky

Sr. Standardization Expert
预研标准部/有线研究院/有线产品经营部 Standard Preresearch Dept./Wireline Product R&D Institute/Wireline Product Operation Division


Original Mail

Sender: AlvaroRetana
To:;gregory mirsky10211915;;
Date: 2021/07/26 18:05
Subject: Re: [Bier] BIER OAM Document Status

On July 26, 2021 at 7:23:57 PM, wrote:


> draft-ietf-bier-pmm-oam - it appears to be marked as "Dead". The authors
> addressed AD review comments, and the updated version is available (not
> expired).

This shows up as "Dead" from the IESG point of view because -06 (which
was the version I returned to the WG) expired: the system then marks
the document as "Dead" (again, from the IESG point of view, not the

What is needed if for the WG to revisit the document: I returned it
because it needs more WG input, and so that I am not the gating
factor.  I will look at the changes after the document goes back
through the process (WGLC, etc) and is sent back for publication.

Take a look at my comments from 2019-07-02:



BIER mailing list