Re: [Bier] BIER OAM Document Status

Alvaro Retana <aretana.ietf@gmail.com> Tue, 27 July 2021 01:05 UTC

Return-Path: <aretana.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: bier@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: bier@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA6BF3A0C83; Mon, 26 Jul 2021 18:05:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id iUMqgOgPvZ1K; Mon, 26 Jul 2021 18:04:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ej1-x62d.google.com (mail-ej1-x62d.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::62d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BECBF3A0C85; Mon, 26 Jul 2021 18:04:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ej1-x62d.google.com with SMTP id hp25so19232461ejc.11; Mon, 26 Jul 2021 18:04:58 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:to :content-transfer-encoding; bh=olDeHFlEejf+oyUTU1hOsnIMlcbyMet7VAbuRXoZ/Lg=; b=CHM/LSkRfB50z4NU4Us5tt9gkfyC80QX23rxkY0ULtiGQ2y+X0BXdfZQYctbZ2YNSk wd9hYKlG+I8FxbTL+RhHd+TMRyxMSpRtHyH/BvQaJn/kt1HNcy4/XifT2CkLGwg1PNp9 xykzt/t+/QXAE8OmqTqHwVLfZ15kher1lSZIhqnazuEqronP3Ph9YXan1pXWkynQZ7ti EOB+h01HtwMo0pYChWmdfw3WSRJ4405SFrKjn0gxMi+FjzOjqpXz4cZQScjpEM+avq05 g4+9PL/IwnNMvtqrm2PbHsm7Vta4wqxEY2v7wcH3VvCTlzG8iViwahvBPKVnFUW2L2VQ X/CA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:date :message-id:subject:to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=olDeHFlEejf+oyUTU1hOsnIMlcbyMet7VAbuRXoZ/Lg=; b=ellp7ViQ9kMV59yq6JkMrOlkQVvSgPB1XnExKlyWeMATj7R3MCc1CKxjE1/a30RBeC DB6DnQZl9bjXjCiVonbSOu5V8FnVb3HpstcnP6dyvRB+WHvmCY8fm7RT8hri9nLvDfi0 D5A7IqL44/2muWjLX3itwxMuTHGA7wyAYWJjVN5gs6MkHgVaCAA1L0YXXf08WyE7+mkz EGtfiodLpL2/sIJyYLW+4voRtXgCROqMjLcSE9a/m7Pn69FTn6nFI/K2qkYVOgTpBm7Y KQW+2z5mNELzYWHr9JW+31qEncsvFH2Dau9GhFYcwxvmVRV89DwRhCEwfYt7+h8NDiqs et6g==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532jPUCyBdbESpD+E4QOsEv8ks4TWpZz4BhsckUyvbxRPEK4r6g6 73RQFgWt26IodlZMvb33dI9v5UDJftW59j0CoDUyDI+2+h8=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxiUXuZiPT+xIAX+XjLUH9nbhlZWGvYIbuzL4JVMeWxT/StA47CQoU3MZolhwL2W8sZi3Lv5l+e3KYT8/5Yr3Y=
X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:838f:: with SMTP id p15mr19878189ejx.300.1627347893858; Mon, 26 Jul 2021 18:04:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 1058052472880 named unknown by gmailapi.google.com with HTTPREST; Mon, 26 Jul 2021 18:04:53 -0700
From: Alvaro Retana <aretana.ietf@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <202107270723485614060@zte.com.cn>
References: <202107270723485614060@zte.com.cn>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2021 18:04:53 -0700
Message-ID: <CAMMESsx2hRbJoFhJas01Nim7d4fn7VfZe6uBGpAVfYzT34A1Tw@mail.gmail.com>
To: bier-chairs@ietf.org, gregory.mirsky@ztetx.com, bier@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bier/9oSzT1xSQ62JQJCCjeXnYoIVIhw>
Subject: Re: [Bier] BIER OAM Document Status
X-BeenThere: bier@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "\"Bit Indexed Explicit Replication discussion list\"" <bier.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/bier>, <mailto:bier-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/bier/>
List-Post: <mailto:bier@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bier-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bier>, <mailto:bier-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2021 01:05:04 -0000

On July 26, 2021 at 7:23:57 PM, gregory.mirsky@ztetx.com wrote:


Hi!


> draft-ietf-bier-pmm-oam - it appears to be marked as "Dead". The authors
> addressed AD review comments, and the updated version is available (not
> expired).

This shows up as "Dead" from the IESG point of view because -06 (which
was the version I returned to the WG) expired: the system then marks
the document as "Dead" (again, from the IESG point of view, not the
WG).

What is needed if for the WG to revisit the document: I returned it
because it needs more WG input, and so that I am not the gating
factor.  I will look at the changes after the document goes back
through the process (WGLC, etc) and is sent back for publication.

Take a look at my comments from 2019-07-02:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bier-pmmm-oam/history/


Thanks!

Alvaro.