IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Bier] Alissa Cooper's No Objection on draft-ietf-bier-architecture-07: (with COMMENT)

Alia Atlas <akatlas@gmail.com> Wed, 05 July 2017 17:33 UTC

Return-Path: <akatlas@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: bier@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: bier@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 606DC131D79; Wed, 5 Jul 2017 10:33:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.998
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ozdJbb04maRZ; Wed, 5 Jul 2017 10:33:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wr0-x232.google.com (mail-wr0-x232.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c0c::232]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 44B9C13013C; Wed, 5 Jul 2017 10:33:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wr0-x232.google.com with SMTP id c11so266851086wrc.3; Wed, 05 Jul 2017 10:33:07 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=ShH10azF8DPSvXY8oNTs3Ntwhhu9msg8xnFuK6ctOSo=; b=Df84TpSSjHgOet4J07dQaSAAr8hEe4ZE1zG7jEC9q18Drh6s4Csvrm3CwnUbAoOG0b I0b6vuqfhs8sHiVnVxl6it9PWJfr7ZBqhC/yExzTtGA4Rfo/0VhkUkQfS01QvcOGN1Sr FPs6vHfF+tXdG+lVGUn4/A18q4H4jpuciz9gNBcDFqFlmbZ8/ghT+f6vrNOKiEVw86ZZ DrySBFMo1kfYcwFm4skFpSTjoaAxsvsFx8LQRRVi2wWkuOHX0fICzMtz8PoiIXdb7Vbm /euCsXqW5T3xb7klobH4KdsxwD/d+jLtf1y2pQGnjOhDhlyfb0WuRg7KUIc0T/vSoH+e LXPw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=ShH10azF8DPSvXY8oNTs3Ntwhhu9msg8xnFuK6ctOSo=; b=M0V+6LvECAgE6wbbVpQxKH0nOChYAoDLNyxzGLBBqYKiueVsVJXXqscWV1Wk9KXzb1 luYZiSuHfPcwKM9X7ecliclfq1w0gGPplKU0l0xdvU7a+YyZyrvs+0ENa1IAxnoVK+yU hVzCWEJJf49q9m9kEhwr1bf3oZTHwHpcJ3p5wDG6/BnRxIkayeAFhDpuqpvZI7cQ9EV9 DCVYR0epjUcej35Zs+UIULBjECV3SCb5EYr3m0pvSSrTVGlpqStCoK7bna4oONGCP9FK mPDlMHwto7F4+5u+pEJbs1JHMsaQ6Yvq6BxGWoniN7ZW3MChzYyIJKR4qoTp9cBUsAdO kBfA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AKS2vOy0aXcd3maf2oqVnS9UA0LaHEBy6rK+2NgeI3hT5m6p5Te3+OXC Hp67UV4ZJFVM+5vyWmDYVYnHsdsQd5G2
X-Received: by 10.223.133.99 with SMTP id 90mr41798046wrh.44.1499275985665; Wed, 05 Jul 2017 10:33:05 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.223.130.179 with HTTP; Wed, 5 Jul 2017 10:33:05 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <149927538373.13537.9199064503158854739.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
References: <149927538373.13537.9199064503158854739.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
From: Alia Atlas <akatlas@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 05 Jul 2017 13:33:05 -0400
Message-ID: <CAG4d1re4gRbJrLVZ_vP81pjWJa3MMkKtzymohzr-HG5BuQ7huQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in>
Cc: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-bier-architecture@ietf.org, Greg Shepherd <gjshep@gmail.com>, "bier@ietf.org" <bier@ietf.org>, bier-chairs@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="94eb2c0d293e8bc67f0553956476"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bier/Bl71kYOVHM5FC0GgqtZq-Nhnwvc>
Subject: Re: [Bier] Alissa Cooper's No Objection on draft-ietf-bier-architecture-07: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: bier@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "\"Bit Indexed Explicit Replication discussion list\"" <bier.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/bier>, <mailto:bier-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/bier/>
List-Post: <mailto:bier@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bier-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bier>, <mailto:bier-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Jul 2017 17:33:10 -0000

The entire WG is chartered as Experimental.  There is a document in the
charter (item 9) to justify progressing this work onto the Standards
Track.  The protocol extension drafts are going to be Experimental for now
as well. This is precisely at the narrow point of the hourglass - a
multicast encapsulation to go with IP.

Regards,
Alia

On Wed, Jul 5, 2017 at 1:23 PM, Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in> wrote:

> Alissa Cooper has entered the following ballot position for
> draft-ietf-bier-architecture-07: No Objection
>
> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
> introductory paragraph, however.)
>
>
> Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
> for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
>
>
> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bier-architecture/
>
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> COMMENT:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> I'm a bit confused about the experimental status of this document as well,
> given that the other WG drafts that define protocol extensions to support
> BIER
> seem to be headed for the standards track. If what is documented here
> really is
> the only experimental part, this seems like the place to document the
> experiment.
>
>
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email