Re: [Bier] Pre-IETF98 Work

Greg Mirsky <gregimirsky@gmail.com> Wed, 11 January 2017 03:57 UTC

Return-Path: <gregimirsky@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: bier@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: bier@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9AFC91295C5 for <bier@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 10 Jan 2017 19:57:13 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.699
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fdAuwwT_XEvP for <bier@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 10 Jan 2017 19:57:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-oi0-x232.google.com (mail-oi0-x232.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c06::232]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 04F2C12952F for <bier@ietf.org>; Tue, 10 Jan 2017 19:57:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-oi0-x232.google.com with SMTP id w204so74522051oiw.0 for <bier@ietf.org>; Tue, 10 Jan 2017 19:57:11 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=zYxNsb2jSJmAwAx8CYPDZgSw0nfw1HgI6YqeTYBVFj4=; b=BaIjLEaCIv7O1RFTg4fJwYRig53kTYKpUDsUzxr9JnXPa1p7ltqmZsvTRdbvvP/6X9 DKvsalvClWXXD+RtjGjoDQAFOZCy5Xf+cOgisXCxi+oFko4LrPotl0wz6mr2zFDEfdW1 dFyMYjstrwZmjwRXgDdlbSu4FKf73ajp9O3jhzs4QFVdnwggIdHG4BxbBJys4gM9DHc1 kA221eBh98ZYgsTNgKTo+U2zc/+y205YjZTslRvMk66xMSR6jbqwDNxoBhxSqhzTtI/k uGX8AHD7oU0LtlEtpKJvpPmA9TH5UArflUbIi2u7pCI462DLbWb3VBrkG53Oz1LZr6Oz H01Q==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=zYxNsb2jSJmAwAx8CYPDZgSw0nfw1HgI6YqeTYBVFj4=; b=WONRTgnnkKEY+o8fBs8VZLh26QzhHedavYiIYwBwoDcjC1EHrHsWsfEUGtURbz3FBb /wyqd/g/She/sFWtdBwCYlu8LOt3w6FFA9jHKbyfzRHHGu1ZKOBbyt1zce1ACRetlRIw TqL9un/BQcohTsIVuwS26p52HeJeuE5asQoBjjGGP60PPQ60Hb9O8z/cx+4ND4jw8lCm bqb8TQVKQWqKE6JEvO5qHj/dqZCASjRvacQfMXGeHo2xGwRZNO2VD5yjXbPB/WNFWh7F svhx52uV9SSL7B38IBfMTkwje7q+V9nftcHBVOMUbeIuYqzvrcEEpgqng18mg/7maKx3 vxzA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AIkVDXJfcrUH855Ykcvvf0/vTohLyW4imFUmCx/XNSmpuQX1wD7K88YCknmAZ/OscTQWFHF0Zk6G+5mrDk6tIQ==
X-Received: by 10.202.232.80 with SMTP id f77mr2923898oih.60.1484107031342; Tue, 10 Jan 2017 19:57:11 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.157.1.103 with HTTP; Tue, 10 Jan 2017 19:57:10 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CABFReBr28gGCd+gm0fATYDugYtdW5JJnu30RUBg035hS6Z44_A@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CABFReBr28gGCd+gm0fATYDugYtdW5JJnu30RUBg035hS6Z44_A@mail.gmail.com>
From: Greg Mirsky <gregimirsky@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2017 19:57:10 -0800
Message-ID: <CA+RyBmUf+uDyk4PS74jKaWd5iXSdRMS1y4M+DPxBCp6x0pd1Ng@mail.gmail.com>
To: Greg Shepherd <gjshep@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a1140831e6974000545c99833"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bier/DP06b5synwvO5lZ7DLCFemJl4Zs>
Cc: "bier@ietf.org" <bier@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Bier] Pre-IETF98 Work
X-BeenThere: bier@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "\"Bit Indexed Explicit Replication discussion list\"" <bier.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/bier>, <mailto:bier-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/bier/>
List-Post: <mailto:bier@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bier-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bier>, <mailto:bier-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2017 03:57:13 -0000

Hi Greg, et. al,
I'll refresh draft-ietf-bier-pmmm-oam and draft-ietf-bier-path-mtu-discovery
shortly.Would WG Chairs consider adding draft-ietf-bier-oam-requirements to
the list of candidates?

Regards,
Greg

On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 11:09 AM, Greg Shepherd <gjshep@gmail.com> wrote:

> *,
>
> There are several expiring WG drafts which need to be addressed. Let's
> take a look at these and see if any of them represent complete work. At our
> last meeting it was suggested that we potentially have docs which could be
> advanced to WGLC, but wouldn't have to go into the Editor's Queue yet,
> pending the WG's completion of the reqs to recharter all of our work into
> the Proposed Standards track.
>
> I suggest we start with this list of expiring docs to either advance to
> WGLC or rev/refresh as necessary:
>
> draft-ietf-bier-architecture
> draft-ietf-bier-isis-extensions
> draft-ietf-bier-ospf-extensions
> draft-ietf-bier-ping
> draft-ietf-bier-pmmm-oam
> draft-ietf-bier-path-mtu-discovery
>
> The MPLS encap draft:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bier-mpls-encapsulation/
> ..should now represent the consensus on our unified encapsulation. This
> too could be a candidate for WGLC
>
> MVPN draft was just rev'd:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bier-mvpn/
> Please read and respond to the list with any issues.
>
> Thanks,
> Chairs
> (Greg)
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> BIER mailing list
> BIER@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bier
>
>