Re: [Bier] WGLC: draft-ietf-bier-multicast-http-response

Alvaro Retana <> Fri, 17 December 2021 13:09 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A8223A0EAB for <>; Fri, 17 Dec 2021 05:09:45 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.096
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.096 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, FREEMAIL_REPLY=1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id RYuKylctOMfk for <>; Fri, 17 Dec 2021 05:09:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ( [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::530]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C94203A0EA9 for <>; Fri, 17 Dec 2021 05:09:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: by with SMTP id z29so7592557edl.7 for <>; Fri, 17 Dec 2021 05:09:40 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=20210112; h=from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=VjQSulTiNRAmABSARnK2voDM7Bco6tkPmDs3VV8sRNQ=; b=Znzi5GlqU0rbRw6ZFLdP7iUPqz2MxsfyRuxqK9ukoz93KVFSubHOFDwJ/2xeMOaIE4 YOkdMbpcPaS+K5lLkZ25rwR7e5lW0wWQ2gOHjRLsZr/sdEq5QdRZVoyry/qbGpnFFOvL sR3gxnkVqEJTR+b8nEu3V4pu1+eH1U+MU/HpgjBGk8BkuKFZhucD/NvnkUyrNEClpbuf heBLptjPXFqJtXVc5tiLjMd+8EPd3XovbRGLlngXzlbgmfyIga7X+l7y3Igqldqhitgs A1GeRd9IZ4nGZ9vVoEBV8wgwdttlnKVzevr+SAqDRWn/uLgU61TC9WTfNctj2Q3nnyhi fUSQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=VjQSulTiNRAmABSARnK2voDM7Bco6tkPmDs3VV8sRNQ=; b=RuD5fAR4dciIc//LOIL2N5FB3u7Sqx0WoWXbpAPppVUtuQkk9hnYvnCX+pXcJs9l3+ zQsuNZ9ClsNV0SjTxKgbd5+xjlbszYu5SAUcFdarYgQKEm+ptOUGp0JXMemNuo2/eDjj EbK3NlGo4X9VtY9tmSXjMoveOLb0/t7pLj8NtChIGHBtt7A4cHHh3RbqglnR4IHJ4R2z jM707UT1xGeYXyViorIvSan7ifiN0BNTyH8/iuJMPeX5IYn6+iIGDZO/hlPgJeCRqz6y mPLjQgZWH0iiEWnlAGgORVNoD2YLSdMLYLuTEMiBhJGuumFVFzqlvy72TrjmO+jH0Pkg ZHAA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532Kv9X3ZDkfXl4Sv4HMmANNbUHq4q4wzbZlTmbvOJKp2uo666Na yZdLd5ETUzOBZwLZwaDAGaPPJBZtfQj//6AI+P1c1SGI
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxzTEjQ+bx8DSXY7CZ5hgfnBK7k66xrFtsVtIobIBOY7PMqN2OO30Fu3ossG6cFpfPgN+npganvSAQs7f0oghQ=
X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:3da9:: with SMTP id he41mr2526897ejc.105.1639746577492; Fri, 17 Dec 2021 05:09:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: from 1058052472880 named unknown by with HTTPREST; Fri, 17 Dec 2021 05:09:36 -0800
From: Alvaro Retana <>
In-Reply-To: <>
References: <> <>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2021 05:09:36 -0800
Message-ID: <>
Cc: BIER WG <>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000045eff405d3574045"
Archived-At: <>
Subject: Re: [Bier] WGLC: draft-ietf-bier-multicast-http-response
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "\"Bit Indexed Explicit Replication discussion list\"" <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2021 13:09:45 -0000



It is important in light of rfc8789, which requires that all IETF documents
reach consensus, to demonstrate that the WG cares and has reviewed,
commented, etc.  Silence is not a good indicator of consensus. Thanks for
following up on this!

If there is interest in the WG, and given that this document deals with
HTTP level multicast, please request an early review from both the ART and
Transport areas review teams before sending it off for publication.

A couple of quick comments for the authors.  Please use the rfc8174
template (not rfc2119).  I am surprised that there are no Normative
references (



On December 9, 2021 at 12:19:05 PM, Greg Shepherd ( wrote:

Zero response for this WGLC, not even from the authors. Is this work still
of interest to anyone in the WG?

- Shep

On Mon, Nov 22, 2021 at 8:45 AM Greg Shepherd <> wrote:

> This email starts a 2 week WGLC timer for
> draft-ietf-bier-multicast-http-response. Please read and review:
> We also need a doc Shepherd before we can progress this work. Can someone
> please step up to help.
> Thanks,
> - Shep
> (Chairs)
BIER mailing list