IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Bier] DISCUSS? SI vs. sub-domains - draft-ietf-bier-architecture-02 (was: Re: Questions on draft-eckert-bier-te-arch-01)

Antoni Przygienda <antoni.przygienda@ericsson.com> Tue, 13 October 2015 17:48 UTC

Return-Path: <antoni.przygienda@ericsson.com>
X-Original-To: bier@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: bier@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5CD21A0167 for <bier@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 13 Oct 2015 10:48:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.201
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.201 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id I3z92SRSs1ZA for <bier@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 13 Oct 2015 10:48:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from usevmg20.ericsson.net (usevmg20.ericsson.net [198.24.6.45]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ACC8A1A014F for <bier@ietf.org>; Tue, 13 Oct 2015 10:48:14 -0700 (PDT)
X-AuditID: c618062d-f79ef6d000007f54-2d-561ce3ab9f68
Received: from EUSAAHC007.ericsson.se (Unknown_Domain [147.117.188.93]) by usevmg20.ericsson.net (Symantec Mail Security) with SMTP id F3.4B.32596.BA3EC165; Tue, 13 Oct 2015 12:57:48 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from EUSAAMB103.ericsson.se ([147.117.188.120]) by EUSAAHC007.ericsson.se ([147.117.188.93]) with mapi id 14.03.0248.002; Tue, 13 Oct 2015 13:48:12 -0400
From: Antoni Przygienda <antoni.przygienda@ericsson.com>
To: Toerless Eckert <eckert@cisco.com>, Caitlin Bestler <caitlin.bestler@nexenta.com>
Thread-Topic: DISCUSS? SI vs. sub-domains - draft-ietf-bier-architecture-02 (was: Re: [Bier] Questions on draft-eckert-bier-te-arch-01)
Thread-Index: AQHRBd3fmuhIG9PzXUCgUfDMd1zwPZ5psmzg
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2015 17:48:11 +0000
Message-ID: <2E4BB27CAB87BF43B4207C0E55860F180EAE3AD1@eusaamb103.ericsson.se>
References: <561C2441.6090606@nexenta.com> <20151013173739.GX13294@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <20151013173739.GX13294@cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [147.117.188.9]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFvrMLMWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUyuXRPrO6axzJhBgs9LZbO2MNk8abvDavF 3uX32CzWbfjA7MDiMeX3RlaPJUt+Mnlcb7rK7rFjYSdrAEsUl01Kak5mWWqRvl0CV8bGRXkF W1krmqbPYWxgXMjSxcjJISFgItH87RUzhC0mceHeerYuRi4OIYGjjBKPnuxlh3CWM0p8XdEL 1sEmYCFx+dtToA4ODhGBcInuCaIgYWYBN4k/TxYygtQLC3QwSjybcp0RJCEi0MkocW8pM4Rt JDHt5TcmEJtFQFXi7epNbCA2r4CvxO/N38HmCwHZ3S9PgMU5BfQlXm9aBzaHEei676fWMEEs E5e49WQ+E8TVAhJL9pyH+kBU4uXjf6wQtqLEvv7p7BD1OhILdn9ig7C1JZYtfM0MsVdQ4uTM JywTGMVmIRk7C0nLLCQts5C0LGBkWcXIUVqcWpabbmSwiREYS8ck2HR3MO55aXmIUYCDUYmH N0FXJkyINbGsuDL3EKM0B4uSOO/+JfdDhQTSE0tSs1NTC1KL4otKc1KLDzEycXBKNTB2slde Mwjx21RzrIFvTdkPp4zLdTcWChi/e9J8SI3358oSpQ8qnF8l829fYX+02tXcbdbist+nHr8I bFque+GEn2vOUj+miffv85zJbGhLudISuYiv5M5/ZYfPaw8YaEpWes6Y6uToVvXmUqxx0eeZ P06f3T+vgD+tXm8j28P2dUHlRs09O02VWIozEg21mIuKEwHt/uv3hgIAAA==
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bier/My3NcRU0KOYhoMyqjlOaXi-_uLY>
Cc: "bier@ietf.org" <bier@ietf.org>, Eric C Rosen <erosen@juniper.net>
Subject: Re: [Bier] DISCUSS? SI vs. sub-domains - draft-ietf-bier-architecture-02 (was: Re: Questions on draft-eckert-bier-te-arch-01)
X-BeenThere: bier@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "\"Bit Indexed Explicit Replication discussion list\"" <bier.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/bier>, <mailto:bier-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/bier/>
List-Post: <mailto:bier@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bier-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bier>, <mailto:bier-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2015 17:48:17 -0000

>    1. AFAIK, we have not defined for BIER any automated schemes to assign
> unique
>    BFR-id to receivers. Doing it once for eg: the physcial topology - manually
>    is a well known process for operators (like allocation of loopback addresses).
>    Doing this repeatedly for multiple apps IMHO requires an automated
>    scheme. This would be a good (potentially DC centric) signaling
>    problem to look into.

 [Tony saiz:]  look @  

https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-prz-bier-bfrid-assignment-00

didn't have time to update, waiting for interest to spike once 
enough people see far enough to understand the problem.  Then I'll reissue. 

--- tony

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email