Re: [Bier] Ethertype for non-MPLS BIER suggestion
Tony Przygienda <tonysietf@gmail.com> Thu, 12 March 2020 19:29 UTC
Return-Path: <tonysietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: bier@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: bier@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E84BE3A07AE; Thu, 12 Mar 2020 12:29:33 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0w5dl0Vh63hy; Thu, 12 Mar 2020 12:29:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-io1-xd32.google.com (mail-io1-xd32.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::d32]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ECE873A07B1; Thu, 12 Mar 2020 12:29:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-io1-xd32.google.com with SMTP id c19so5854111ioo.6; Thu, 12 Mar 2020 12:29:31 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=Du+rKTQqsYRvXNpC2lczlHrleOaK4t1Z0GevgVUHKTg=; b=XX7mtEsV9BaFWkYt8AccEXUfN81aAv/f3Op7cak4G4BiW+/GlOLpDy125e33IlRjeD 8xOWKogcpe33+gfEmO2cYIsE/5jbJTgBd9FIE/LxqlB+/iwR0yRnOZ1iIoj4/Ek9Nljl Cyf2nnz641fN2c1WDr9JfTQXmbXpcWO58z8YFKP+bcRcvp7GH654tkpB4Rt1Iv6IfbM2 2gO+GK4Vw0UUyIYRHaEE8AwSFJBFvMIApsP1x+zaju6md5YmkJt7/z93fGGSc5f5yZpn I6hQTv67SGLz+xoRi4349P9aodlAfPTqY2jMmQYIXe/2nTexyPDlYlxe99LuE8nyu/8V e9GQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=Du+rKTQqsYRvXNpC2lczlHrleOaK4t1Z0GevgVUHKTg=; b=bgAF+L74X0tQQZJcEz60MUizUmH7yAk6/VJSf8+5ivPY3ZyxGGlfxYwdexvKDCWqG4 oUPqTcSASQEX3f8KAG8wNPUWtRubgQlgCPgih4MmobIlb/rLknp8hvFmMbMS2kJ9gP7/ UDlR4lrE8faYPzaAHKwQCzfcBL4M9PES8Kns00h46GSsqrkG4FAnA3jkWicMsXKnHQN3 nhMdEz3rSYc4Nqqnv6ML1S6k+sUbrMjAVkuXLybgm4ofWxagvNbEtQPtHWETk4KMH8Yz 6EDT42W5aQSwkGOK/D7DQs2qu0eO7Z+hPw5xSLFSJ/psG0k2oIsaEeQs81rmTjHwW4XX tmjA==
X-Gm-Message-State: ANhLgQ3odRBxHomsTkDr7wNJ4uCSGlB8L7OH2189uKLiLNiyxVtCO9sD BFYe0Z1WkzZfu/7t7blO3vAxM+LD9nZ2tb71rAY=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADFU+vuxRSHMKxZO3N7d361aFmXrHFRQwQGXRNiq313DZRf/814mwTWNa+MS+toMWbVja+fbh9GJrXUEhmcp0BZDoXg=
X-Received: by 2002:a02:dc6:: with SMTP id 189mr8058351jax.100.1584041370909; Thu, 12 Mar 2020 12:29:30 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20200311225102.GB2331@faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> <CA+wi2hNBH3jBxwe-_ydjvzi1W7KQ=mF=hhLc1=_wjBL2bUjAuQ@mail.gmail.com> <CA+wi2hMuFukCsP0n-Df410wt+hhXOv_2D7s4ahkQBcGnCKL7Bg@mail.gmail.com> <20200312043703.GE2331@faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de>
In-Reply-To: <20200312043703.GE2331@faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de>
From: Tony Przygienda <tonysietf@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2020 12:27:54 -0700
Message-ID: <CA+wi2hOimQOuP4AU76RcPWdGbqc=uiCGwbS668-7vwEv7iYdPw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Toerless Eckert <tte@cs.fau.de>
Cc: BIER WG <bier@ietf.org>, iana@iana.org, bier-ads@ietf.org, BIER WG Chairs <bier-chairs@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000039028b05a0ad5fb4"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bier/Xgd9wR54mI1r5TJUhL5c4EoVy44>
Subject: Re: [Bier] Ethertype for non-MPLS BIER suggestion
X-BeenThere: bier@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "\"Bit Indexed Explicit Replication discussion list\"" <bier.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/bier>, <mailto:bier-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/bier/>
List-Post: <mailto:bier@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bier-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bier>, <mailto:bier-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2020 19:29:40 -0000
yeah, not something I want to chase right now but I get your point. In case you get enlightened how the description can be updated, let me know and we'll start chasing it ... --- tony On Wed, Mar 11, 2020 at 9:37 PM Toerless Eckert <tte@cs.fau.de> wrote: > I never finalized getting ethertypes from IEEE > myself yet, so not sure about the processes. > > Would be nice if IANA or some other designated entity > could take ownership of these assignments, right now > the 8 ethertypes mentioning drafts which are all RFCs > now are all over the place. "TRILL WG", routing-area > or even "Cisco" (SFC/NSH). > > > On Wed, Mar 11, 2020 at 09:01:39PM -0700, Tony Przygienda wrote: > > oh, I see. no idea what the proper "update" procedure in IEEE is. Someone > > feels like ferreting that out? > > > > > > On Wed, Mar 11, 2020 at 9:00 PM Tony Przygienda <tonysietf@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > > I'm surprised, there was an official liaison and assignment from IEEE > of > > > the ethertype. Alia handled it while I remember having filed _the_ > forms > > > ;-) for her ... > > > > > > --- tony > > > > > > On Wed, Mar 11, 2020 at 3:51 PM Toerless Eckert <tte@cs.fau.de> wrote: > > > > > >> Dear IANA, BIER leadership > > >> > > >> Not sure what normal IANA procedures are (or for that matter IEEE > > >> procedures), > > >> but: > > >> > > >> I would appreciate if there was an attempt made to update the > following > > >> record with IEEE: > > >> > > >> http://standards-oui.ieee.org/ethertype/eth.txt > > >> > > >> > > >> AB37 IETF Routing Area Please read > > >> draft-ietf-bier-mpls-encapsulation-12 at > > >> 5177 Brandin Court > > >> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bier-mpls-encapsulation/. > > >> > > >> Fremont CA 94538 > > >> > > >> US > > >> > > >> Aka: Ask IEEE to change explanatory text to rfc8296 > > >> > > >> And for that matter, maybe IANA could check the other 7 entries of > > >> "draft-ietf" in that registry, and get them updated accordingly. > > >> > > >> Cheers > > >> Toerless > > >> > > >> P.S.: Great to see Routing Area has a physical mailbox address at the > > >> LLC. Is that the right way to send snail mail to our AD's ? (don't > > >> answer, just kidding). > > >> > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > BIER mailing list > > BIER@ietf.org > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bier > > > -- > --- > tte@cs.fau.de >
- [Bier] Ethertype for non-MPLS BIER suggestion Toerless Eckert
- Re: [Bier] Ethertype for non-MPLS BIER suggestion Tony Przygienda
- Re: [Bier] Ethertype for non-MPLS BIER suggestion Tony Przygienda
- Re: [Bier] Ethertype for non-MPLS BIER suggestion Toerless Eckert
- Re: [Bier] Ethertype for non-MPLS BIER suggestion Tony Przygienda
- Re: [Bier] Ethertype for non-MPLS BIER suggestion Alvaro Retana
- Re: [Bier] Ethertype for non-MPLS BIER suggestion Toerless Eckert