[Bier] Robert Wilton's No Objection on draft-ietf-bier-te-arch-10: (with COMMENT)
Robert Wilton via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Wed, 25 August 2021 16:14 UTC
Return-Path: <noreply@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: bier@ietf.org
Delivered-To: bier@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A53D3A0E6D; Wed, 25 Aug 2021 09:14:01 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Robert Wilton via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-bier-te-arch@ietf.org, bier-chairs@ietf.org, bier@ietf.org, Xuesong Geng <gengxuesong@huawei.com>, aretana.ietf@gmail.com, gengxuesong@huawei.com
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 7.36.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: Robert Wilton <rwilton@cisco.com>
Message-ID: <162990804160.32697.13876104206144089850@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2021 09:14:01 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bier/ZC2cv4rZmUv0dP8m34wInlb-Rao>
Subject: [Bier] Robert Wilton's No Objection on draft-ietf-bier-te-arch-10: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: bier@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: "\"Bit Indexed Explicit Replication discussion list\"" <bier.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/bier>, <mailto:bier-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/bier/>
List-Post: <mailto:bier@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bier-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bier>, <mailto:bier-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2021 16:14:02 -0000
Robert Wilton has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-bier-te-arch-10: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bier-te-arch/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Thanks for your work on this document. Discuss cleared based on Alvaro's clarification - I was misdirected by the boilerplate of the documents having the wrong status on both tools and datatracker, but the status is right on the RFC editor website and in the datatracker metadata. I've moved the question regarding whether RFC 8296 should be a normative reference to a non-blocking comment. I'm not an expert on the BIER technology, and I didn't have the time to properly read the core references before reviewing this document. However, I didn't spot any obvious issues on the text, beyond the question on the document status. But I also appreciated the detailed section on the operational considerations related to managing the bit position assignments, which I interpret not as a strict requirement of this specification, but likely to be very helpful to controller implementations and operators. Regards, Rob
- [Bier] Robert Wilton's No Objection on draft-ietf… Robert Wilton via Datatracker