Re: [Bier] Martin Vigoureux's No Objection on draft-ietf-bier-te-arch-10: (with COMMENT)

[Toerless Eckert <[e-mail]>]

Thanks, Martin

Detailed replies for your comments below inline.
It should resolve all your concerns.
These have been integrated into draft rev -12
which the authors feel is ready for RFC editor.

Full diff from -11 to -12:

http://tools.ietf.org//rfcdiff?url1=https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-bier-te-arch-11.txt&url2=https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-bier-te-arch-12.txt

Diff with just the deltas for comments by Eric Vyncke, Eric Kline, Martin Vigoroux and Lars Eggert

http://tools.ietf.org//rfcdiff?url1=https://raw.githubusercontent.com/toerless/bier-te-arch/c88c22d82f8e17e66929e2f0d82ca02680b8fe0e/draft-ietf-bier-te-arch.txt&url2=https://raw.githubusercontent.com/toerless/bier-te-arch/ca1c4ec15302e5287c0bd60b9f14d2c58428e50f/draft-ietf-bier-te-arch.txt

Thanks again for your review.

Toerless

On Thu, Aug 26, 2021 at 04:25:33AM -0700, Martin Vigoureux via Datatracker wrote:
> Martin Vigoureux has entered the following ballot position for
> draft-ietf-bier-te-arch-10: No Objection
> 
> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
> introductory paragraph, however.)
> 
> 
> Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
> for more information about DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
> 
> 
> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bier-te-arch/
> 
> 
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> COMMENT:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> Hi,
> 
> thank you for this work.
> 
> Does the text on Segment Routing equally apply to SR-MPLS and SRv6?
> Wouldn't an Informative reference to 8402 be useful?

Great catch. I had it in a section about BIER-TE and traffic engineering,
but that was negotiated out of the document during WG last-call and
i forgot to move the reference down into the SR section.

> 
> Couple nits most surely already found:
> Expand BIFT and BFR on first use (introduction).

Yes, done through other reviewers already.

> s/designed so that is/designed so that its/.

Fixed.

> 

Thanks!
    Toerless