Re: [Bier] RFC8279: Request for authors to update RFC

Greg Shepherd <gjshep@gmail.com> Thu, 17 June 2021 14:37 UTC

Return-Path: <gjshep@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: bier@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: bier@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E9EA3A22B4 for <bier@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 17 Jun 2021 07:37:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.096
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.096 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, FREEMAIL_REPLYTO=1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gZ7Iu65gxkZf for <bier@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 17 Jun 2021 07:36:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ej1-x632.google.com (mail-ej1-x632.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::632]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 653DC3A22A4 for <bier@ietf.org>; Thu, 17 Jun 2021 07:36:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ej1-x632.google.com with SMTP id nb6so10210764ejc.10 for <bier@ietf.org>; Thu, 17 Jun 2021 07:36:58 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:reply-to:from:date:message-id :subject:to; bh=WZXcHaQcJDD+ZvynogiT9KT7Y0dkDOqE7+2Lqu0PgdM=; b=maUaVk70skmutrnEfHNYrzkNynOOe4IuAuYu1EVJBjV0Wm+SeyCEebcIKWObDMvUcb 083h1HD0YPgeRe57IBuT3ayPbbOcsXrV9WYmpHWjsgcyWJzu67cry9WCsRaGzjCkhN3K nJmusQHNDXv41gGdBGZPYlaqujryJfAluszp/8yKP7O9naakPANOcOpQodwAM07CLnCU my9yRwAi4kgoiX5cXhvowwN4iSzql60Nvc5stuTeDRBTzmXrxuRVinFt8KXHwbV7ViIW YUk+CeBBJ8/VZrplrCCSkSYaalGRTlFpgnUTdifyRAitbztvM1ToBMBCf2HDVvFnPU+m mNfA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:reply-to :from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=WZXcHaQcJDD+ZvynogiT9KT7Y0dkDOqE7+2Lqu0PgdM=; b=jrjepfHOFRFi9DcpAnsxI/+FAKqaUWCI/HYT12O4yaw3zzyi/YCLECxqf0iWylYl/l lraykxOf4M/5IVX8k5o+RimxeGGlxdPK918+JBl74r67pCmgwvfubLB7HcQfjjQTanBn hKQ2ICHRcEtNNMGPuqqjtFGtD4xevy6CVpCNv5F4J3MEJxJTt4YKxYKiyktgceKWWP+X i9Mni5XwA/OWVGRa+PpMTm4rnRKiQDAA+Qx76VoV7Ua6BcjFAFFmxHXdS92gLr+aIm5c kqz6ZVQO2E6/Xr8omB8jPNl/jqdmVlkOK3AqhMczedbKajORSxMbqsK2WGbqY1BzUdw7 FrQw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532PfTXEisllViijRs3N1iCG3SuX72vWxfMs7TGBP7p3AzjFKPtd ACm4InumKEzm3z7hfAAl+GOeNvZG0XJsM1SJyVXPX//xzZw1yg==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJw7em1CJIHbOxJQE3Ze7rgrTDWGfsoUUMp6myDrQekutpG/42VAT6WgRo6LRF4ySzDwaKvANAD9z3Ssskt0Okw=
X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:c1d0:: with SMTP id bw16mr5721434ejb.146.1623940614853; Thu, 17 Jun 2021 07:36:54 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CABFReBpjD3V14P8CuO+_OHvZr=XX1c5Dm8SjB9pahJmrQJx5qQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CABFReBpjD3V14P8CuO+_OHvZr=XX1c5Dm8SjB9pahJmrQJx5qQ@mail.gmail.com>
Reply-To: gjshep@gmail.com
From: Greg Shepherd <gjshep@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2021 07:36:43 -0700
Message-ID: <CABFReBq=09MUAm-3HFVmDcspAkMc6_SLj2YoFxS_zN+eVrjjDg@mail.gmail.com>
To: BIER WG <bier@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000007c16e305c4f723c9"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bier/gUPuYNayWE5tXjU1ymFYPaQ5MTM>
Subject: Re: [Bier] RFC8279: Request for authors to update RFC
X-BeenThere: bier@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "\"Bit Indexed Explicit Replication discussion list\"" <bier.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/bier>, <mailto:bier-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/bier/>
List-Post: <mailto:bier@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bier-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bier>, <mailto:bier-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2021 14:37:03 -0000

I believe we have a solid group of volunteers to update the doc:

zhang.zheng@zte.com.cn
hooman.bidgoli@nokia.com
zzhang@juniper.net
hayabusagsm@gmail.com

Thank you for your continued contribution to the work and for stepping up
to this task.

- Greg
(Chairs)


On Sat, Jun 12, 2021 at 6:05 AM Greg Shepherd <gjshep@gmail.com> wrote:

> A big "thank you" to all WG members who have worked so hard to get BIER to
> where it is today. And to no surprise, our work is not done. The following
> bullet points are from the Chairs' technical summary previously sent to the
> list:
>
> • BIER encoding is specified in RFC8296
> • Alia Atlas: “IANA code-points don’t change.  This is the reason why
> BIER began as experimental - narrow
>         point in hourglass”
> • The encoding at the “narrow point of the hourglass” – the forwarding
> plane –  is the foundation from which
>         the rest of the architecture grows.
> • This was the position of the IESG and the BIER WG ADs at the time of
> the original WG Experimental Charter.
> • This is admittedly historic/institutional knowledge of those involved
> in the WG from the beginning. But it is also
>         a core tenet of the layered and scalable architecture of the
> Internet and was erroneously assumed as
>         well-understood by the original WG contributors. The WG needs to
> update the BIER architecture to make this
>         responsibility clear for all future contributors.
>
> RFC8279 began as a draft at the very beginning of the WG. It has since
> been made clear that the authors at that time had assumed the importance of
> the forwarding plane as the foundation of architecture was well understood
> by the community at large. That no longer seems to be the case.
> Additionally, the draft of RFC8279 began before the draft of RFC8296 was
> complete, and even before the assignment of the IEEE BIER ethertype.
>
> This is a call for volunteers to update RFC8279 to better define BIER at
> the forwarding plane, and clarify how IETF-standard encapsulation
> mechanisms can be used to transit BIER packets, while preserving the core
> tenet of a layered and scalable architecture of the Internet.
>
> If you would like to tackle this update, please reply to this thread.
>
> Thanks,
> Greg
> (Chairs)
>