Re: [Bier] BIER rechartering

Tony Przygienda <tonysietf@gmail.com> Wed, 24 January 2018 05:28 UTC

Return-Path: <tonysietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: bier@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: bier@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1CEB012D95F for <bier@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 23 Jan 2018 21:28:38 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.699
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id M1YQ2j9VTcIF for <bier@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 23 Jan 2018 21:28:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-wm0-x230.google.com (mail-wm0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::230]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6035E1275C5 for <bier@ietf.org>; Tue, 23 Jan 2018 21:28:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-wm0-x230.google.com with SMTP id 143so5950974wma.5 for <bier@ietf.org>; Tue, 23 Jan 2018 21:28:35 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=532r4sm4EDK9n9uxa6m7AaCl979zuRiGDSz1UYXaaiE=; b=vB4IZFVgdc+qDcpoeapZsOQEHWGWjKypPkWhd16AAS1uBYTZTSDyMioRE++gGjVl0X tOZ5jAGBObA1FAPXcUbZQ2RCAKFY/cRbtoF7yJ33t94jPpkZy9zYLQ7tXrOMnk3kLnOb A8NugraF8Yb63E5daDHULdJ/qgLK66n58r0wom1OjivMiL8+oGRx7gO01HlKM3LQAosO fO0uRrWh95GyxYiw0QrwfFWMJa0Jl2DGRsVvCOibdSJr6H1Bhi0gPLzHxq6f6Zviq0cO k5PFIJyKZXZlNTWSqpHes06WHxCePoquE7En9GaqFBkJ9fONPGqNvs/SXKnntnDvPrsH UuVA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=532r4sm4EDK9n9uxa6m7AaCl979zuRiGDSz1UYXaaiE=; b=IvIfIwkGJi0hcxn9NNXeCnmpHUse2SEAhsqfgYfqhhQgyd2rwMuV+7OhYuYCSfVdk4 C7NtEHivD8tA5CiD5tmgbx5ub7Sgi5EAaT24ywqBxyvfHuSbur1OeWQXWpnRsAfQ88Du yPbDfo5UOKwQYr6gtzZeMXHVnhqOqDEX6sixANGj/N5Z4BwOC4I+uVvwQfRkq7Q403Tt mVSFtVeMItJPUi4oqvRlAiBIV3yIBHXMhtg3buB7tXRZWwceDRx2dGbdlCsMtigr3dcI P5PMo2e/OB5yl9H6I7AdSJCXvk5d/AgWdHC1Ldy+J6DQLfE0qJTYs/8Ya5HaUrq46uND US4Q==
X-Gm-Message-State: AKwxytfC5BT1gS9aD4ACO7Yp652xNZvB20HcCWtZ0h7PrzNXjuqeEdDu GxOzBRG8bCwiM5fvQRoXaIbmCvLZStRgLsRwgTM=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AH8x224wUle6p/v0UrZa7LTHZ0fdCp1R9ew9LCBk4gAn3KBRGUuuxpICC9VzgY/xyw/6dIVeQkavESfGX7/pHRu/pQ8=
X-Received: by 10.80.183.97 with SMTP id g88mr20891491ede.191.1516771713899; Tue, 23 Jan 2018 21:28:33 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.80.182.239 with HTTP; Tue, 23 Jan 2018 21:27:53 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <20646310-FA88-4A6B-B14E-D2FDD834970A@nokia.com>
References: <CAG4d1rdCysU+qnb=9U9iaZ+UefudWYDmz=mNPSfhDPuWNQQHVw@mail.gmail.com> <B9800CBE-2810-46F9-B802-8823AE769699@nokia.com> <CA+wi2hO112XTHLZuJSsPxZzGhAY1A6RTGDBt-+n6XXc6WXodDw@mail.gmail.com> <20646310-FA88-4A6B-B14E-D2FDD834970A@nokia.com>
From: Tony Przygienda <tonysietf@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2018 21:27:53 -0800
Message-ID: <CA+wi2hPr3J+SXF79xwabKdFwau85v1d00X_k9+HCnEr3UaH9Wg@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Dolganow, Andrew (Nokia - SG/Singapore)" <andrew.dolganow@nokia.com>
Cc: Alia Atlas <akatlas@gmail.com>, "bier@ietf.org" <bier@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="94eb2c19506836629705637eefdc"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bier/qO9qSy6CoV4D0XiJfBLoWNoIsrU>
Subject: Re: [Bier] BIER rechartering
X-BeenThere: bier@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "\"Bit Indexed Explicit Replication discussion list\"" <bier.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/bier>, <mailto:bier-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/bier/>
List-Post: <mailto:bier@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bier-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bier>, <mailto:bier-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2018 05:28:38 -0000

Hey Mr A,  I see 2 separate points here

1) if we talk "let's do something for v6 no silicon BIER forwarding" that's
one charter point & I think it's fine
2) if we talk about "let's talk about BIERoANYTHING as long it's 1-hop fwd'
paradigm" then I'm fine with adding that as well albeit I admit I think
with Ether & MPLS we have practical cases I see licked for some foreseable
future (maybe the famous penultimate words ;-)

-- tony

On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 8:56 PM, Dolganow, Andrew (Nokia - SG/Singapore) <
andrew.dolganow@nokia.com> wrote:

> Tony,
>
>
>
> This is discussion on charter not individual draft. We did have some good
> discussion on the draft below as reflected by minutes. My comment is that
> the charter as proposed limits potential solutions unnecessarily. I propose
> we remove trhe limiting condition “Such functionality may focus on
> assuming software or slow-path support first” from the charter.
>
>
>
> Andrew
>
>
>
> *From: *Tony Przygienda <tonysietf@gmail.com>
> *Date: *Wednesday, January 24, 2018 at 12:00 PM
> *To: *Andrew Dolganow <andrew.dolganow@nokia.com>
> *Cc: *Alia Atlas <akatlas@gmail.com>, "bier@ietf.org" <bier@ietf.org>
> *Subject: *Re: [Bier] BIER rechartering
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Ad> Can we say “in co-operation with IETF WGs chartered with IGP protocol
> ownership”  instead of “in cooperation with the LSR WG”. DO not want to
> re-charter in case we change/modify/merge/evolve other WGs.
>
>
> The BIER-WG is additionally chartered to start Standards Track work on:
>   7) BIER in IPv6 :  A mechanism to use BIER natively in IPv6 may be
>      standardized if coordinated with the 6MAN WG and with understood
>      applicability.  Such functionality may focus on assuming software or
>      slow-path support first.
>
> Ad> I do not think we should limit unnecessarily the solution or open
> doors for things that are possible (anything can be done in S/W) but
> potentially of little value. SO if someone brings a proposal for slow-path
> BIER we will evaluate on usefulness to use case being solved.
>
>
>
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-zhang-bier-bierin6-00
>
>
>