[Bier] bier-frr w/ a single bift

Michael Menth <menth@uni-tuebingen.de> Wed, 17 March 2021 14:34 UTC

Return-Path: <menth@uni-tuebingen.de>
X-Original-To: bier@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: bier@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BE1E3A0DF1 for <bier@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 17 Mar 2021 07:34:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fBrgRXog2uk1 for <bier@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 17 Mar 2021 07:34:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx04.uni-tuebingen.de (mx04.uni-tuebingen.de [IPv6:2001:7c0:300c:3105::8602:5d6]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 95EB53A0DEE for <bier@ietf.org>; Wed, 17 Mar 2021 07:34:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.0.69] (HSI-KBW-078-043-000-193.hsi4.kabel-badenwuerttemberg.de [78.43.0.193]) by mx04.uni-tuebingen.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6AC51209A217 for <bier@ietf.org>; Wed, 17 Mar 2021 15:34:47 +0100 (CET)
To: BIER WG <bier@ietf.org>
From: Michael Menth <menth@uni-tuebingen.de>
Message-ID: <0ce6aef0-1370-bc4e-42e8-08aab268847a@uni-tuebingen.de>
Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2021 15:34:49 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.8.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bier/rAttM3wzNqZ6-Aq5tsvqXbS2FfQ>
Subject: [Bier] bier-frr w/ a single bift
X-BeenThere: bier@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "\"Bit Indexed Explicit Replication discussion list\"" <bier.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/bier>, <mailto:bier-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/bier/>
List-Post: <mailto:bier@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bier-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bier>, <mailto:bier-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2021 14:34:55 -0000

Hi all,

one of the advantages of LFA-based bier-frr is that duplicates may be
avoided. However, I think this is only true if we have either

1) failure-spedific bifts (which is not preferred?)

or

2) the possibility to first process BFERs which are affected by a failure

If assumption 2) is acceptable, I think a single-bift draft for all
bier-frr solution is feasible.

Comments?

Regards

Michael

-- 
Prof. Dr. habil. Michael Menth
University of Tuebingen
Faculty of Science
Department of Computer Science
Chair of Communication Networks
Sand 13, 72076 Tuebingen, Germany
phone: (+49)-7071/29-70505
fax: (+49)-7071/29-5220
mailto:menth@uni-tuebingen.de
http://kn.inf.uni-tuebingen.de