Re: [Bier] WGLC draft-ietf-bier-architecture-05

"Nagendra Kumar Nainar (naikumar)" <naikumar@cisco.com> Mon, 08 May 2017 11:20 UTC

Return-Path: <naikumar@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: bier@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: bier@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8AB0612943A for <bier@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 8 May 2017 04:20:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.522
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.522 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JyRxi5zEIk0h for <bier@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 8 May 2017 04:20:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from alln-iport-7.cisco.com (alln-iport-7.cisco.com [173.37.142.94]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F0705127868 for <bier@ietf.org>; Mon, 8 May 2017 04:20:55 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=4265; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1494242455; x=1495452055; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:references:in-reply-to: mime-version; bh=XVgbFC/9O2Ktp5z4T7JXP2s26NpK6A0WFCC+ifJw3s8=; b=Q81cev47tw+qTkjK7QgBdBqlxXELePohl2i1MJF4vwfskeWeeqiYetkn 6PSntGcjFkuq6t6qjPAiJTY3/osyjdc9oh5x34wGR5fPuhSUmNQxHLcF9 MlxWBjyZp0Rsh5yAdeGOBK5hP98AeiTr/tdbTjZs4q2zhXhOJsWLA7aCA k=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0AuAQBxUxBZ/5RdJa1cGQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBBwEBAQEBgm48K2KBDAeERIk1kVaII4gXhTiCDyyFeAKEVT8YAQIBAQEBAQEBayiFFQEBAQEDgQkCAQgEDQECAQIoByERFAMGCAIEARKKCAMVDrQWhyYNgy4BAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEbBYg9gxuCVIFgEgE8hUkFlmaGWDsBhxuHKoRSggSFPINmhkaLKYkUAR84fwtwFYc5doY9gSGBDQEBAQ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.38,309,1491264000"; d="scan'208,217";a="423281574"
Received: from rcdn-core-12.cisco.com ([173.37.93.148]) by alln-iport-7.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 08 May 2017 11:20:54 +0000
Received: from XCH-ALN-013.cisco.com (xch-aln-013.cisco.com [173.36.7.23]) by rcdn-core-12.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id v48BKsB3022616 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Mon, 8 May 2017 11:20:54 GMT
Received: from xch-rcd-015.cisco.com (173.37.102.25) by XCH-ALN-013.cisco.com (173.36.7.23) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1210.3; Mon, 8 May 2017 06:20:53 -0500
Received: from xch-rcd-015.cisco.com ([173.37.102.25]) by XCH-RCD-015.cisco.com ([173.37.102.25]) with mapi id 15.00.1210.000; Mon, 8 May 2017 06:20:54 -0500
From: "Nagendra Kumar Nainar (naikumar)" <naikumar@cisco.com>
To: "gjshep@gmail.com" <gjshep@gmail.com>, "bier@ietf.org" <bier@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Bier] WGLC draft-ietf-bier-architecture-05
Thread-Index: AQHSxfLZk9/WkVNSFU+THVC3lmdCEqHqXx6A
Date: Mon, 08 May 2017 11:20:53 +0000
Message-ID: <D535CCBF.217CA6%naikumar@cisco.com>
References: <CABFReBp-LnmyNV5VjiF4YW+9zqXn7L6WLFKgPr8aEZ88DTEqVQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CABFReBp-LnmyNV5VjiF4YW+9zqXn7L6WLFKgPr8aEZ88DTEqVQ@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.7.1.161129
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.82.221.11]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_D535CCBF217CA6naikumarciscocom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bier/s7c1_MGZDR58eDQ9uTs47AGGXpc>
Subject: Re: [Bier] WGLC draft-ietf-bier-architecture-05
X-BeenThere: bier@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "\"Bit Indexed Explicit Replication discussion list\"" <bier.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/bier>, <mailto:bier-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/bier/>
List-Post: <mailto:bier@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bier-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bier>, <mailto:bier-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 May 2017 11:20:57 -0000

Support.

Thanks,
Nagendra

From: BIER <bier-bounces@ietf.org<mailto:bier-bounces@ietf.org>> on behalf of Greg Shepherd <gjshep@gmail.com<mailto:gjshep@gmail.com>>
Reply-To: "gjshep@gmail.com<mailto:gjshep@gmail.com>" <gjshep@gmail.com<mailto:gjshep@gmail.com>>
Date: Friday, May 5, 2017 at 6:56 PM
To: "bier@ietf.org<mailto:bier@ietf.org>" <bier@ietf.org<mailto:bier@ietf.org>>
Subject: [Bier] WGLC draft-ietf-bier-architecture-05

At WG meeting, IETF97 in Chicago, we decided to move forward to WGLC for some of our docs. We learned that even once published the IESG has a process to change the track of the RFC if the WG makes the case to move the work from Informational to Standards track. The feedback from operators is that RFC status was more important than track, and we won't be able to meet our charter requirements to change track without deployment experience and operator support.

This email starts a two week timer for feedback on the draft:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bier-architecture/

Please read and respond do this thread. EOWGLC - 20/5/17

Thank you,
Chairs