IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Bier] WGLC draft-ietf-bier-architecture-05

"Jeffrey (Zhaohui) Zhang" <zzhang@juniper.net> Mon, 08 May 2017 05:11 UTC

Return-Path: <zzhang@juniper.net>
X-Original-To: bier@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: bier@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F2761250B8 for <bier@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 7 May 2017 22:11:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.021
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.021 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=juniper.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id teybqDmmPEGd for <bier@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 7 May 2017 22:11:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from NAM03-CO1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-co1nam03on0105.outbound.protection.outlook.com [104.47.40.105]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D93721200ED for <bier@ietf.org>; Sun, 7 May 2017 22:11:32 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=juniper.net; s=selector1; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version; bh=JPDH3SRbj06eTY24AXVmDZIyvEHjxLmTPnfgQe6Tt3Q=; b=E+Xi8065fo8k56FV1U/D9qktDLZiM4HwahLLOovthVdxqxvflRgE92gAwQjyLuQ2MIp6kbl5SCV+tWKLRVTZp8ynzjbxNvlBUU7q8Qe6Z3Y9ExzEPrTL8VPljtmU6ErneKKUtb/f/d+4ZSR+bdSVvk8x/m5awPCKFngxWtK4Y08=
Received: from DM5PR05MB3145.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.173.219.15) by DM5PR05MB3147.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.173.219.17) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1084.7; Mon, 8 May 2017 05:11:31 +0000
Received: from DM5PR05MB3145.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([10.173.219.15]) by DM5PR05MB3145.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([10.173.219.15]) with mapi id 15.01.1084.015; Mon, 8 May 2017 05:11:31 +0000
From: "Jeffrey (Zhaohui) Zhang" <zzhang@juniper.net>
To: "gjshep@gmail.com" <gjshep@gmail.com>, "bier@ietf.org" <bier@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Bier] WGLC draft-ietf-bier-architecture-05
Thread-Index: AQHSxfLYvFIibqGT7E+PN35yq0QrVKHp5yiw
Date: Mon, 08 May 2017 05:11:31 +0000
Message-ID: <DM5PR05MB3145D45EE51776BF00554533D4EE0@DM5PR05MB3145.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
References: <CABFReBp-LnmyNV5VjiF4YW+9zqXn7L6WLFKgPr8aEZ88DTEqVQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CABFReBp-LnmyNV5VjiF4YW+9zqXn7L6WLFKgPr8aEZ88DTEqVQ@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
authentication-results: gmail.com; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;gmail.com; dmarc=none action=none header.from=juniper.net;
x-originating-ip: [66.129.241.13]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; DM5PR05MB3147; 7:9PKpRjjTgrk3Z56XUT7wlLjsa4U4UOsR6rwRCFvvwE6Rdqu0dyQ5mrGkVNFyPObuX/LHcLJrJgqnohHViv25QdrhrGiGWebsR+WF3xRmj4MDYqXCfMUfXGZpUVkjdptGSZr5uku1QRCo6jM6Wujcpa033rlcPmZHGLLoqR6uIGszARknz6F6/tgYhBCrGZXdhVW2XKNaXNqDfasTayEzNIEqQ35vddGnnpcolaQcrSuv529XGf4K4eRP99rTFq/Th3X9KUz/cB4DP7GHjjjAKG7VKlvIx69dOOz3kQKXLvSJApWK8wBKP29VqVf17hJHjSxlDwJZU346OjI6/TCgqA==
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: c45df173-95fe-4174-1839-08d495d0b0cb
x-ms-office365-filtering-ht: Tenant
x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(22001)(2017030254075)(48565401081)(201703131423075)(201703031133081)(201702281549075); SRVR:DM5PR05MB3147;
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <DM5PR05MB3147F556DD811CDF5656CFEAD4EE0@DM5PR05MB3147.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:(120809045254105)(21748063052155);
x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(6040450)(601004)(2401047)(8121501046)(5005006)(10201501046)(3002001)(93006095)(93001095)(6055026)(6041248)(20161123558100)(20161123562025)(20161123560025)(201703131423075)(201702281528075)(201703061421075)(201703061406153)(20161123555025)(20161123564025)(6072148); SRVR:DM5PR05MB3147; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:DM5PR05MB3147;
x-forefront-prvs: 0301360BF5
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(979002)(39410400002)(39400400002)(39840400002)(39850400002)(39450400003)(39860400002)(377454003)(3280700002)(229853002)(5660300001)(236005)(2906002)(122556002)(6306002)(3660700001)(9686003)(2501003)(7736002)(2950100002)(606005)(7906003)(54896002)(189998001)(76176999)(99286003)(478600001)(50986999)(54356999)(74316002)(7696004)(33656002)(6436002)(25786009)(53546009)(8676002)(66066001)(77096006)(8936002)(81166006)(55016002)(39060400002)(790700001)(102836003)(3846002)(53946003)(38730400002)(6116002)(53936002)(86362001)(6246003)(2900100001)(6506006)(230783001)(969003)(989001)(999001)(1009001)(1019001); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:DM5PR05MB3147; H:DM5PR05MB3145.namprd05.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; MLV:ovrnspm; PTR:InfoNoRecords; LANG:en;
spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:99
spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_DM5PR05MB3145D45EE51776BF00554533D4EE0DM5PR05MB3145namp_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: juniper.net
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 08 May 2017 05:11:31.6437 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: bea78b3c-4cdb-4130-854a-1d193232e5f4
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: DM5PR05MB3147
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bier/x1p_V9x0sCT5vHFlYAF_1t9PML4>
Subject: Re: [Bier] WGLC draft-ietf-bier-architecture-05
X-BeenThere: bier@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "\"Bit Indexed Explicit Replication discussion list\"" <bier.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/bier>, <mailto:bier-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/bier/>
List-Post: <mailto:bier@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bier-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bier>, <mailto:bier-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 May 2017 05:11:35 -0000

Support.

From: BIER [mailto:bier-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Greg Shepherd
Sent: Friday, May 5, 2017 6:56 PM
To: bier@ietf.org
Subject: [Bier] WGLC draft-ietf-bier-architecture-05

At WG meeting, IETF97 in Chicago, we decided to move forward to WGLC for some of our docs. We learned that even once published the IESG has a process to change the track of the RFC if the WG makes the case to move the work from Informational to Standards track. The feedback from operators is that RFC status was more important than track, and we won't be able to meet our charter requirements to change track without deployment experience and operator support.

This email starts a two week timer for feedback on the draft:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bier-architecture/

Please read and respond do this thread. EOWGLC - 20/5/17

Thank you,
Chairs

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email