Re: Autonomous System Sanity Protocol

Tony Li <tli@jnx.com> Mon, 28 April 1997 04:30 UTC

Received: from cnri by ietf.org id aa10107; 28 Apr 97 0:30 EDT
Received: from murtoa.cs.mu.OZ.AU by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa01495; 28 Apr 97 0:30 EDT
Received: from mailing-list by murtoa.cs.mu.OZ.AU (8.6.9/1.0) id OAA11975; Mon, 28 Apr 1997 14:18:52 +1000
Received: from munnari.OZ.AU by murtoa.cs.mu.OZ.AU (8.6.9/1.0) with SMTP id OAA11946; Mon, 28 Apr 1997 14:07:55 +1000
Received: from red.jnx.com by munnari.OZ.AU with SMTP (5.83--+1.3.1+0.56) id EA22827; Mon, 28 Apr 1997 14:07:49 +1000 (from tli@jnx.com)
Received: from chimp.jnx.com (chimp.jnx.com [208.197.169.6]) by red.jnx.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id VAA09613; Sun, 27 Apr 1997 21:07:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from tli@localhost) by chimp.jnx.com (8.7.6/8.7.3) id VAA02740; Sun, 27 Apr 1997 21:07:15 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Sun, 27 Apr 1997 21:07:15 -0700 (PDT)
Message-Id: <199704280407.VAA02740@chimp.jnx.com>
From: Tony Li <tli@jnx.com>
To: bmanning@isi.edu
Cc: jnc@ginger.lcs.mit.edu, tli@jnx.com, big-internet@munnari.oz.au
In-Reply-To: <199704271522.AA08584@zephyr.isi.edu> (bmanning@ISI.EDU)
Subject: Re: Autonomous System Sanity Protocol
Precedence: bulk

   So you would like to discriminate between the chain for 18/8 and the
   36.128/9 yes?  And find out that there is a viable chain for 18/8 and a
   broken chain for 36.128/9 from that particular AS?

Exactly.  Notice how this fixes the AS 7007 problem: everything's broken so
we know to discard the routes.

Tony