Re: another flow snapshot

Tony Li <tli@cisco.com> Tue, 16 January 1996 10:05 UTC

Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa17674; 16 Jan 96 5:05 EST
Received: from CNRI.Reston.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa17667; 16 Jan 96 5:05 EST
Received: from [128.250.22.5] by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa23182; 16 Jan 96 5:04 EST
Received: from mailing-list by murtoa.cs.mu.OZ.AU (8.6.9/1.0) id UAA19396; Tue, 16 Jan 1996 20:56:27 +1100
Received: from munnari.oz.au by murtoa.cs.mu.OZ.AU (8.6.9/1.0) with SMTP id UAA19367; Tue, 16 Jan 1996 20:49:56 +1100
Received: from greatdane.cisco.com by munnari.oz.au with SMTP (5.83--+1.3.1+0.55) id JA12575; Tue, 16 Jan 1996 20:49:55 +1100 (from tli@cisco.com)
Received: (tli@localhost) by greatdane.cisco.com (8.6.8+c/8.6.5) id BAA13661; Tue, 16 Jan 1996 01:49:53 -0800
Date: Tue, 16 Jan 1996 01:49:53 -0800
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: Tony Li <tli@cisco.com>
Message-Id: <199601160949.BAA13661@greatdane.cisco.com>
To: big-internet@munnari.oz.au
Subject: Re: another flow snapshot
Precedence: bulk

   Thank you very much for publishing these snapshots, a very useful piece of
   information.  One question, though.  Several loony academics (i.e. me and
   others) may want to quote them in research papers, e.g. for calibrating
   their studies.  What would be the proper attribution ?  If I described them
   as "data measured by Sean Doran in January 1996 on a typical router of
   Sprint's Internet," would you object ?

While many people are quite certain that Sean and Sprint would like total
control of the Internet, I'm not quite willing to concede that fact.  Yet.

;-) ;-) ;-)

Tony