Re: another flow snapshot

Christian Huitema <huitema@pax.inria.fr> Tue, 16 January 1996 09:27 UTC

Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa16412; 16 Jan 96 4:27 EST
Received: from CNRI.Reston.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa16408; 16 Jan 96 4:27 EST
Received: from [128.250.22.5] by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa17836; 16 Jan 96 4:26 EST
Received: from mailing-list by murtoa.cs.mu.OZ.AU (8.6.9/1.0) id UAA19330; Tue, 16 Jan 1996 20:17:24 +1100
Received: from munnari.oz.au by murtoa.cs.mu.OZ.AU (8.6.9/1.0) with SMTP id UAA19301; Tue, 16 Jan 1996 20:07:13 +1100
Received: from pax.inria.fr by munnari.oz.au with SMTP (5.83--+1.3.1+0.55) id JA22234; Tue, 16 Jan 1996 20:07:08 +1100 (from huitema@pax.inria.fr)
Received: from [138.96.24.178] by pax.inria.fr (8.6.12/8.6.12) with SMTP id KAA27831; Tue, 16 Jan 1996 10:04:21 +0100
Date: Tue, 16 Jan 1996 10:04:21 +0100
Message-Id: <v02120d02ad212501a401@[138.96.24.178]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
To: Sean Doran <smd@icp.net>
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: Christian Huitema <huitema@pax.inria.fr>
Subject: Re: another flow snapshot
Cc: big-internet@munnari.oz.au
Precedence: bulk

Sean,

Thank you very much for publishing these snapshots, a very useful piece of
information.  One question, though.  Several loony academics (i.e. me and
others) may want to quote them in research papers, e.g. for calibrating
their studies.  What would be the proper attribution ?  If I described them
as "data measured by Sean Doran in January 1996 on a typical router of
Sprint's Internet," would you object ?

Christian Huitema