Re: another flow snapshot
Vadim Antonov <avg@sprint.net> Wed, 17 January 1996 00:09 UTC
Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa09404;
16 Jan 96 19:09 EST
Received: from CNRI.Reston.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa09400;
16 Jan 96 19:09 EST
Received: from murtoa.cs.mu.OZ.AU by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa24078;
16 Jan 96 19:09 EST
Received: from mailing-list by murtoa.cs.mu.OZ.AU (8.6.9/1.0)
id KAA20280; Wed, 17 Jan 1996 10:58:24 +1100
Received: from munnari.oz.au by murtoa.cs.mu.OZ.AU (8.6.9/1.0) with SMTP
id KAA20251; Wed, 17 Jan 1996 10:45:08 +1100
Received: from titan.sprintlink.net by munnari.oz.au with SMTP
(5.83--+1.3.1+0.55)
id XA07723; Wed, 17 Jan 1996 10:44:50 +1100 (from avg@sprint.net)
Received: (from avg@localhost) by titan.sprintlink.net (8.6.9/8.6.9) id
SAA24715; Tue, 16 Jan 1996 18:44:35 -0500
Date: Tue, 16 Jan 1996 18:44:35 -0500
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: Vadim Antonov <avg@sprint.net>
Message-Id: <199601162344.SAA24715@titan.sprintlink.net>
To: huitema@pax.inria.fr, smd@icp.net
Subject: Re: another flow snapshot
Cc: big-internet@munnari.oz.au
Precedence: bulk
Christian, SL-KC-2 is not a "typical router". It was recently installed and its load is, er, close to none. The load on real busy routers (SL-DC-8?) is far far more than that, but those are 7000s, not 7500s, so flows cannot be realistically measured. --vadim From owner-Big-Internet@munnari.OZ.AU Tue Jan 16 04:34:44 1996 Received: from tiny.sprintlink.net (tiny.sprintlink.net [199.0.55.90]) by titan.sprintlink.net (8.6.9/8.6.9) with ESMTP id EAA24104 for <avg@titan.sprintlink.net>et>; Tue, 16 Jan 1996 04:34:43 -0500 Received: from murtoa.cs.mu.OZ.AU (murtoa.cs.mu.OZ.AU [128.250.22.5]) by tiny.sprintlink.net (8.6.9/8.6.9) with ESMTP id EAA23866; Tue, 16 Jan 1996 04:34:37 -0500 Received: from mailing-list by murtoa.cs.mu.OZ.AU (8.6.9/1.0) id UAA19322; Tue, 16 Jan 1996 20:16:12 +1100 Received: from munnari.oz.au by murtoa.cs.mu.OZ.AU (8.6.9/1.0) with SMTP id UAA19301; Tue, 16 Jan 1996 20:07:13 +1100 Received: from pax.inria.fr by munnari.oz.au with SMTP (5.83--+1.3.1+0.55) id JA22234; Tue, 16 Jan 1996 20:07:08 +1100 (from huitema@pax.inria.fr) Received: from [138.96.24.178] by pax.inria.fr (8.6.12/8.6.12) with SMTP id KAA27831; Tue, 16 Jan 1996 10:04:21 +0100 Date: Tue, 16 Jan 1996 10:04:21 +0100 Message-Id: <v02120d02ad212501a401@[138.96.24.178]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: Sean Doran <smd@icp.net> From: huitema@pax.inria.fr (Christian Huitema) Subject: Re: another flow snapshot Cc: big-internet@munnari.OZ.AU Precedence: bulk Status: R Sean, Thank you very much for publishing these snapshots, a very useful piece of information. One question, though. Several loony academics (i.e. me and others) may want to quote them in research papers, e.g. for calibrating their studies. What would be the proper attribution ? If I described them as "data measured by Sean Doran in January 1996 on a typical router of Sprint's Internet," would you object ? Christian Huitema
- another flow snapshot Sean Doran
- Re: another flow snapshot Simon Spero
- Re: another flow snapshot Christian Huitema
- Re: another flow snapshot Tony Li
- Re: another flow snapshot Sean Doran
- Re: another flow snapshot Sean Doran
- Re: another flow snapshot Vadim Antonov
- Re: another flow snapshot k claffy
- Re: another flow snapshot (fwd) Hans-Werner Braun
- Re: another flow snapshot (fwd) Andrew Molitor
- Re: another flow snapshot Bill Manning