Re: another flow snapshot

Vadim Antonov <avg@sprint.net> Wed, 17 January 1996 00:09 UTC

Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa09404; 16 Jan 96 19:09 EST
Received: from CNRI.Reston.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa09400; 16 Jan 96 19:09 EST
Received: from murtoa.cs.mu.OZ.AU by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa24078; 16 Jan 96 19:09 EST
Received: from mailing-list by murtoa.cs.mu.OZ.AU (8.6.9/1.0) id KAA20280; Wed, 17 Jan 1996 10:58:24 +1100
Received: from munnari.oz.au by murtoa.cs.mu.OZ.AU (8.6.9/1.0) with SMTP id KAA20251; Wed, 17 Jan 1996 10:45:08 +1100
Received: from titan.sprintlink.net by munnari.oz.au with SMTP (5.83--+1.3.1+0.55) id XA07723; Wed, 17 Jan 1996 10:44:50 +1100 (from avg@sprint.net)
Received: (from avg@localhost) by titan.sprintlink.net (8.6.9/8.6.9) id SAA24715; Tue, 16 Jan 1996 18:44:35 -0500
Date: Tue, 16 Jan 1996 18:44:35 -0500
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: Vadim Antonov <avg@sprint.net>
Message-Id: <199601162344.SAA24715@titan.sprintlink.net>
To: huitema@pax.inria.fr, smd@icp.net
Subject: Re: another flow snapshot
Cc: big-internet@munnari.oz.au
Precedence: bulk

Christian, SL-KC-2 is not a "typical router".  It was recently installed
and its load is, er, close to none.

The load on real busy routers (SL-DC-8?) is far far more than that, but
those are 7000s, not 7500s, so flows cannot be realistically measured.

--vadim

From owner-Big-Internet@munnari.OZ.AU Tue Jan 16 04:34:44 1996
Received: from tiny.sprintlink.net (tiny.sprintlink.net [199.0.55.90]) by titan.sprintlink.net (8.6.9/8.6.9) with ESMTP id EAA24104 for <avg@titan.sprintlink.net>et>; Tue, 16 Jan 1996 04:34:43 -0500
Received: from murtoa.cs.mu.OZ.AU (murtoa.cs.mu.OZ.AU [128.250.22.5]) by tiny.sprintlink.net (8.6.9/8.6.9) with ESMTP id EAA23866; Tue, 16 Jan 1996 04:34:37 -0500
Received: from mailing-list by murtoa.cs.mu.OZ.AU (8.6.9/1.0)
	id UAA19322; Tue, 16 Jan 1996 20:16:12 +1100
Received: from munnari.oz.au by murtoa.cs.mu.OZ.AU (8.6.9/1.0) with SMTP
	id UAA19301; Tue, 16 Jan 1996 20:07:13 +1100
Received: from pax.inria.fr by munnari.oz.au with SMTP (5.83--+1.3.1+0.55)
	id JA22234; Tue, 16 Jan 1996 20:07:08 +1100 (from huitema@pax.inria.fr)
Received: from [138.96.24.178] by pax.inria.fr (8.6.12/8.6.12) with SMTP id KAA27831; Tue, 16 Jan 1996 10:04:21 +0100
Date: Tue, 16 Jan 1996 10:04:21 +0100
Message-Id: <v02120d02ad212501a401@[138.96.24.178]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
To: Sean Doran <smd@icp.net>
From: huitema@pax.inria.fr (Christian Huitema)
Subject: Re: another flow snapshot
Cc: big-internet@munnari.OZ.AU
Precedence: bulk
Status: R

Sean,

Thank you very much for publishing these snapshots, a very useful piece of
information.  One question, though.  Several loony academics (i.e. me and
others) may want to quote them in research papers, e.g. for calibrating
their studies.  What would be the proper attribution ?  If I described them
as "data measured by Sean Doran in January 1996 on a typical router of
Sprint's Internet," would you object ?

Christian Huitema