Re: Autonomous System Sanity Protocol
Tim Bass <bass@linux.silkroad.com> Wed, 30 April 1997 14:12 UTC
Received: from cnri by ietf.org id aa11613; 30 Apr 97 10:12 EDT
Received: from murtoa.cs.mu.OZ.AU by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa10986; 30 Apr 97 10:12 EDT
Received: from mailing-list by murtoa.cs.mu.OZ.AU (8.6.9/1.0) id AAA15797; Thu, 1 May 1997 00:01:45 +1000
Received: from munnari.OZ.AU by murtoa.cs.mu.OZ.AU (8.6.9/1.0) with SMTP id XAA15766; Wed, 30 Apr 1997 23:52:40 +1000
Received: from linux.silkroad.com by munnari.OZ.AU with SMTP (5.83--+1.3.1+0.56) id NA22252; Wed, 30 Apr 1997 23:52:36 +1000 (from bass@linux.silkroad.com)
Received: (from bass@localhost) by linux.silkroad.com (8.7.3/8.6.9) id JAA24174; Wed, 30 Apr 1997 09:52:04 -0400
From: Tim Bass <bass@linux.silkroad.com>
Message-Id: <199704301352.JAA24174@linux.silkroad.com>
Subject: Re: Autonomous System Sanity Protocol
To: Noel Chiappa <jnc@ginger.lcs.mit.edu>
Date: Wed, 30 Apr 1997 09:52:04 -0400
Cc: jnc@ginger.lcs.mit.edu, tli@jnx.com, RADIA_PERLMAN@novell.com, big-internet@munnari.oz.au
In-Reply-To: <9704291929.AA07733@ginger.lcs.mit.edu> from "Noel Chiappa" at Apr 29, 97 03:29:56 pm
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24 PGP2]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk
Noel> (and predecessors) doing something that I just *knew* was technically Noel> ill-advised, (e.g. IPv6), but I've come to understand that it doesn't do any Noel> good to bang my head on the wall, or get upset about it. It doesn't do anyone Noel> any good, least of all me. I just have to be patient and wait. Just a suggestion, Noel. The world would greatly benefit by a very detailed technical book written by you (and others) . A book that completely documents your knowledge base. IMHO., you could move on to the 'next level' of the issue; and the 'world' would have a chance to catch up. Then your 'head banging' could be transformed into 'key banging'..... explaining to the more pedestrian engineers the nuts and bolts of your intellect. My guess is (apologies for the tacit barb) ... if Einstein could convince the world the value of relativity physics, then is it possible to move beyond 'banging heads' on scalable routing on a global scale. Best Regards, Tim
- Re: Autonomous System Sanity Protocol Bill Manning
- Re: Autonomous System Sanity Protocol Noel Chiappa
- Re: Autonomous System Sanity Protocol Per Gregers Bilse
- Re: Autonomous System Sanity Protocol Pedro Marques
- Re: Autonomous System Sanity Protocol Tony Li
- Re: Autonomous System Sanity Protocol Noel Chiappa
- Re: Autonomous System Sanity Protocol Michael Dillon
- Re: Autonomous System Sanity Protocol RADIA PERLMAN
- Re: Autonomous System Sanity Protocol Noel Chiappa
- Re: Autonomous System Sanity Protocol Tony Li
- Re: Autonomous System Sanity Protocol Jeremy Porter
- Re: Autonomous System Sanity Protocol Noel Chiappa
- Re: Autonomous System Sanity Protocol Valdis.Kletnieks
- Re: Autonomous System Sanity Protocol Andrew Partan
- Re: Autonomous System Sanity Protocol Tony Li
- Re: Autonomous System Sanity Protocol Jeff Young
- Re: Autonomous System Sanity Protocol Bill Manning
- Re: Autonomous System Sanity Protocol Tony Li
- Re: Autonomous System Sanity Protocol Donald E. Eastlake 3rd
- Re: Autonomous System Sanity Protocol Jon Crowcroft
- Re: Autonomous System Sanity Protocol Noel Chiappa
- Re: Autonomous System Sanity Protocol Noel Chiappa
- Re: Autonomous System Sanity Protocol Donald E. Eastlake 3rd
- Re: Autonomous System Sanity Protocol Noel Chiappa
- Re: Autonomous System Sanity Protocol Noel Chiappa
- Re: Autonomous System Sanity Protocol Noel Chiappa
- Re: Autonomous System Sanity Protocol Andrew Partan
- Re: Autonomous System Sanity Protocol Noel Chiappa
- Re: Autonomous System Sanity Protocol William Allen Simpson
- Re: Autonomous System Sanity Protocol William Allen Simpson
- Re: Autonomous System Sanity Protocol Tim Bass
- Re: Autonomous System Sanity Protocol Jon Crowcroft