Re: Metcalfes "imminent death of the internet" prediction

Randy Bush <randy@psg.com> Fri, 26 July 1996 00:50 UTC

Received: from ietf.org by ietf.org id aa17438; 25 Jul 96 20:50 EDT
Received: from cnri by ietf.org id aa17434; 25 Jul 96 20:50 EDT
Received: from murtoa.cs.mu.OZ.AU by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa00789; 25 Jul 96 20:50 EDT
Received: from mailing-list by murtoa.cs.mu.OZ.AU (8.6.9/1.0) id KAA25080; Fri, 26 Jul 1996 10:33:26 +1000
Received: from munnari.OZ.AU by murtoa.cs.mu.OZ.AU (8.6.9/1.0) with SMTP id KAA25048; Fri, 26 Jul 1996 10:15:38 +1000
Received: from roam.psg.com by munnari.OZ.AU with SMTP (5.83--+1.3.1+0.56) id AA16853; Fri, 26 Jul 1996 10:15:14 +1000 (from randy@psg.com)
Received: by roam.psg.com id m0ujaYZ-0004zqC; Thu, 25 Jul 96 17:15 PDT (Smail3.1.29.1#1)
Message-Id: <m0ujaYZ-0004zqC@roam.psg.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Jul 1996 17:15:00 -0700
Sender: ietf-archive-request@ietf.org
From: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
To: "Kent W. England" <kwe@6sigmanets.com>
Cc: big-internet@munnari.oz.au
Subject: Re: Metcalfes "imminent death of the internet" prediction
References: <2.2.32.19960725233454.0073d594@mail.cts.com>
Precedence: bulk

Jack Ricard's response to Metcalfe's imminent demise prediction:
> Having survived the 327 deaths of FidoNet, I don't doubt it. I just don't
> think anyone will be able to tell without test instruments."

There is an interesting analog between the folk trying to set up 'fake' root
name servers and the FidoNet schismic nodelists.  Unless the masses believe
in your namespace, it is vaccuous.

randy