Re: Comparing an old flow snapshot with some packet size data

John Lekashman <lekash@nas.nasa.gov> Mon, 12 August 1996 01:32 UTC

Received: from ietf.org by ietf.org id aa08069; 11 Aug 96 21:32 EDT
Received: from cnri by ietf.org id aa08065; 11 Aug 96 21:32 EDT
Received: from murtoa.cs.mu.OZ.AU by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa12456; 11 Aug 96 21:32 EDT
Received: from mailing-list by murtoa.cs.mu.OZ.AU (8.6.9/1.0) id LAA17822; Mon, 12 Aug 1996 11:09:21 +1000
Received: from munnari.OZ.AU by murtoa.cs.mu.OZ.AU (8.6.9/1.0) with SMTP id KAA17790; Mon, 12 Aug 1996 10:49:41 +1000
Received: from mulga.cs.mu.OZ.AU by munnari.OZ.AU with SMTP (5.83--+1.3.1+0.56) id AA21920; Mon, 12 Aug 1996 10:49:31 +1000 (from lekash@nas.nasa.gov)
Received: from wilbur.nas.nasa.gov by mulga.cs.mu.OZ.AU with SMTP (5.83--+1.3.1+0.50) id AA26700; Mon, 12 Aug 1996 10:49:21 +1000 (from lekash@nas.nasa.gov)
Received: (from lekash@localhost) by wilbur.nas.nasa.gov (8.6.12/NAS.6.1) id RAA23218; Sun, 11 Aug 1996 17:42:56 -0700
Date: Sun, 11 Aug 1996 17:42:56 -0700
Sender: ietf-archive-request@ietf.org
From: John Lekashman <lekash@nas.nasa.gov>
Message-Id: <199608120042.RAA23218@wilbur.nas.nasa.gov>
To: asp@partan.com
Cc: brian@dxcoms.cern.ch, dorian@cic.net, big-internet@munnari.oz.au
In-Reply-To: <199608100420.AAA11116@home.partan.com> (message from Andrew Partan on Sat, 10 Aug 1996 00:20:47 -0400 (EDT))
Subject: Re: Comparing an old flow snapshot with some packet size data
Precedence: bulk

   From: Andrew Partan <asp@partan.com>
   Any high performance internet folks out there?  What would you do
   (or want us to do)?

What we do:
We use HIPPI and FDDI switches, 100baseT, collapsed backbones inside
routers and hubs, and whatever other tools we can find or fund the
creation thereof, from all sorts of vendors.

Then there's this small matter of engineering with the tools one has,
for a given problem.  

What we want you to do:
Engineer things well.  Figure out what your target is, and build to
it.  That's a somewhat pithy and annoying answer, but its what you
have to do.  And its a lot of work to do well.

   From: "Dorian R. Kim" <dorian@cic.net>
   I would think that the problem of just simply going faster and the problem of
   making massively aggregated flows flow through bigger pipes are not quite the
   same thing.
   
Yes, moving tons of small packets is different from moving tons of
data.  Different optimizations can occur, depending on your target.


					 john

remember.  simple is really, really hard.
lekash@nas.nasa.gov