IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: another flow snapshot (fwd)

Andrew Molitor <amolitor@anubis.network.com> Wed, 17 January 1996 17:43 UTC

Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa16066; 17 Jan 96 12:43 EST
Received: from CNRI.Reston.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa16062; 17 Jan 96 12:43 EST
Received: from murtoa.cs.mu.OZ.AU by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa10069; 17 Jan 96 12:43 EST
Received: from mailing-list by murtoa.cs.mu.OZ.AU (8.6.9/1.0) id EAA21329; Thu, 18 Jan 1996 04:37:26 +1100
Received: from munnari.oz.au by murtoa.cs.mu.OZ.AU (8.6.9/1.0) with SMTP id EAA21300; Thu, 18 Jan 1996 04:23:11 +1100
Received: from nsco.network.com by munnari.oz.au with SMTP (5.83--+1.3.1+0.55) id RA24219; Thu, 18 Jan 1996 04:22:38 +1100 (from amolitor@anubis.network.com)
Received: from anubis.network.com by nsco.network.com (4.1/1.34) id AA29019; Wed, 17 Jan 96 11:24:46 CST
Received: from blefscu.network.com by anubis.network.com (4.1/SMI-4.1) id AA02087; Wed, 17 Jan 96 11:23:45 CST
Date: Wed, 17 Jan 96 11:23:45 CST
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: Andrew Molitor <amolitor@anubis.network.com>
Message-Id: <9601171723.AA02087@anubis.network.com>
To: big-internet@munnari.oz.au
Subject: Re: another flow snapshot (fwd)
Precedence: bulk

	Would it be possible for someone to interpret these tables for the
dummy (or, to be optimistic, dummies) among us? I get most of it, but there's
some fuzzy bits too. The tables of routing cache activity posted a while back
were a little mysterious too, but I was too chicken to ask.

	This is not to suggest that I don't appreciate such information,
it's obviously a great kindness to take these snapshots and make them
available.

		Andrew

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email