Re: relative traffic snapshots
Tony Li <tli@cisco.com> Thu, 08 February 1996 19:47 UTC
Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa20252;
8 Feb 96 14:47 EST
Received: from CNRI.Reston.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa20247;
8 Feb 96 14:47 EST
Received: from murtoa.cs.mu.OZ.AU by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa11174;
8 Feb 96 14:47 EST
Received: from mailing-list by murtoa.cs.mu.OZ.AU (8.6.9/1.0)
id GAA18725; Fri, 9 Feb 1996 06:36:29 +1100
Received: from munnari.oz.au by murtoa.cs.mu.OZ.AU (8.6.9/1.0) with SMTP
id GAA18707; Fri, 9 Feb 1996 06:32:28 +1100
Received: from greatdane.cisco.com by munnari.oz.au with SMTP
(5.83--+1.3.1+0.55)
id TA25009; Fri, 9 Feb 1996 06:32:26 +1100 (from tli@cisco.com)
Received: (tli@localhost) by greatdane.cisco.com (8.6.8+c/8.6.5) id LAA22766;
Thu, 8 Feb 1996 11:30:55 -0800
Date: Thu, 8 Feb 1996 11:30:55 -0800
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: Tony Li <tli@cisco.com>
Message-Id: <199602081930.LAA22766@greatdane.cisco.com>
To: Andrew Molitor <amolitor@anubis.network.com>
Cc: big-internet@munnari.oz.au
Subject: Re: relative traffic snapshots
Precedence: bulk
Could someone please interpret? Well, Darren's out for a bit, but sure... 'Flows/Sec'? Is that flows set up per second? Yes. Over what averaging interval? Averaged over the entire sample (i.e., since the last time the statisics were cleared). Or perhaps it's flows seen to be active over the most recent second? 'Packets/Flow'? I have a hard time imagining that the average telnet session takes 40 packets, so perhaps it's some kind of average? Yes, of course that's an average. That's total packets divided by flows. You should also note that if a flow appears idle for a long time (32s) then we assume it has died. So if you go get a cup of coffee, that would look like a new flow. Again, I do appreciate seeing real numbers like this, lest I seem excessively grouchy. Arf! Tony
- relative traffic snapshots Sean Doran
- Re: relative traffic snapshots k claffy
- Re: relative traffic snapshots Dorian Kim
- Re: relative traffic snapshots Andrew Molitor
- Re: relative traffic snapshots Tony Li
- Re: relative traffic snapshots Dorian Kim
- Re: relative traffic snapshots Sean Doran
- Re: relative traffic snapshots Dorian Kim
- Re: relative traffic snapshots Andrew Molitor