Re: Comparing an old flow snapshot with some packet size data
Andrew Partan <asp@partan.com> Thu, 08 August 1996 20:32 UTC
Received: from ietf.org by ietf.org id aa20947; 8 Aug 96 16:32 EDT
Received: from cnri by ietf.org id aa20943; 8 Aug 96 16:32 EDT
Received: from murtoa.cs.mu.OZ.AU by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa14067; 8 Aug 96 16:32 EDT
Received: from mailing-list by murtoa.cs.mu.OZ.AU (8.6.9/1.0) id GAA13368; Fri, 9 Aug 1996 06:20:05 +1000
Received: from munnari.OZ.AU by murtoa.cs.mu.OZ.AU (8.6.9/1.0) with SMTP id FAA13339; Fri, 9 Aug 1996 05:58:58 +1000
Received: from home.partan.com by munnari.OZ.AU with SMTP (5.83--+1.3.1+0.56) id TA31071; Fri, 9 Aug 1996 05:58:55 +1000 (from asp@partan.com)
Received: (from asp@localhost) by home.partan.com (8.6.12/8.6.12) id PAA01711; Thu, 8 Aug 1996 15:58:00 -0400
Sender: ietf-archive-request@ietf.org
From: Andrew Partan <asp@partan.com>
Message-Id: <199608081958.PAA01711@home.partan.com>
Subject: Re: Comparing an old flow snapshot with some packet size data
To: Paul Ferguson <pferguso@cisco.com>
Date: Thu, 08 Aug 1996 15:58:00 -0400
Cc: jhawk@bbnplanet.com, kwe@6sigmanets.com, big-internet@munnari.oz.au
In-Reply-To: <199608070224.TAA05610@lint.cisco.com> from "Paul Ferguson" at Aug 6, 96 10:23:33 pm
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24]
Content-Type: text
Content-Length: 448
Precedence: bulk
This is all interesting stuff. One question that I have been trying to figure out is What size MTU should an ISP support on its backbone? If we view the future where lots of hosts are connected via ethernet and fast ethernet & the like, then a MTU of 1500 would be 'correct'. If we think that the future will have lots of hosts connected via Fddi or similar, then a MTU of 4470 would be 'better'. Any ideas? --asp@partan.com (Andrew Partan)
- Re: Comparing an old flow snapshot with some pack… Greg Minshall
- Re: Comparing an old flow snapshot with some pack… Dorian R. Kim
- Re: Comparing an old flow snapshot with some pack… John Hawkinson
- Re: Comparing an old flow snapshot with some pack… Michael A. Patton
- Re: Comparing an old flow snapshot with some pack… Greg Minshall
- Re: Comparing an old flow snapshot with some pack… Kent W. England
- Re: Comparing an old flow snapshot with some pack… Paul Ferguson
- Re: Comparing an old flow snapshot with some pack… Andrew Partan
- Re: Comparing an old flow snapshot with some pack… Greg Minshall
- Re: Comparing an old flow snapshot with some pack… Paul Ferguson
- Re: Comparing an old flow snapshot with some pack… Karl Denninger, MCSNet
- Re: Comparing an old flow snapshot with some pack… Evan Wetstone
- Re: Comparing an old flow snapshot with some pack… Kent W. England
- Re: Comparing an old flow snapshot with some pack… Kent W. England
- Re: Comparing an old flow snapshot with some pack… Jeremy Porter
- Re: Comparing an old flow snapshot with some pack… Dorian R. Kim
- Re: Comparing an old flow snapshot with some pack… Brian Carpenter CERN-CN
- Re: Comparing an old flow snapshot with some pack… Andrew Partan
- Re: Comparing an old flow snapshot with some pack… Andrew Partan
- Re: Comparing an old flow snapshot with some pack… Dorian R. Kim
- Re: Comparing an old flow snapshot with some pack… John Lekashman
- Re: Comparing an old flow snapshot with some pack… Robert Moskowitz
- Re: Comparing an old flow snapshot with some pack… Kent W. England
- Re: Comparing an old flow snapshot with some pack… Robert Moskowitz
- Re: Comparing an old flow snapshot with some pack… John Hawkinson
- Re: Comparing an old flow snapshot with some pack… Dorian R. Kim