Re: [Bimi] BIMI/DMARC & PSL vs Tree-walk

Dave Crocker <dhc@dcrocker.net> Sat, 13 May 2023 14:50 UTC

Return-Path: <dhc@dcrocker.net>
X-Original-To: bimi@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: bimi@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49A2BC15106C for <bimi@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 13 May 2023 07:50:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=dcrocker.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gJFGMKg7ifCF for <bimi@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 13 May 2023 07:50:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from olivedrab.birch.relay.mailchannels.net (olivedrab.birch.relay.mailchannels.net [23.83.209.135]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9A9C9C15108E for <bimi@ietf.org>; Sat, 13 May 2023 07:50:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Sender-Id: hostingeremail|x-authsender|dhc@dcrocker.net
Received: from relay.mailchannels.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by relay.mailchannels.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id C83805C1A3E for <bimi@ietf.org>; Sat, 13 May 2023 14:50:41 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from uk-fast-smtpout1.hostinger.io (unknown [127.0.0.6]) (Authenticated sender: hostingeremail) by relay.mailchannels.net (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 088D55C1828 for <bimi@ietf.org>; Sat, 13 May 2023 14:50:40 +0000 (UTC)
ARC-Seal: i=1; s=arc-2022; d=mailchannels.net; t=1683989441; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=DB8hxdAuC1ETpDc7rfQKKumt+T8m6ERdgxG6rurxV+3S7MYQ8tuYHjhoQyeNFacvzdABEa eG8YqfvCC/q5VN5LcAZSSifpSRsIY3nI05McsAoYzi3QJ9bbjYND5xU+mkeIIb7fj15D+B 6UcaQlHjgpmYWtETvRRpHTkO13x2/4p92MUSOtsxQxMcW3LshmOz97v4Ltgi1g3iXQsk+l zivvDAQsOvZvIGJkKx/t9PustF7OKY1k26F4KPzSvpl0fMBa4FfHGwCmMW9I+lFXh0ezV9 7fAYrGuDjTd/sjFjkdsrkLNkkVJVu4CIA+b4Ve89MlaOMwghOFdFDFBaxjCatA==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mailchannels.net; s=arc-2022; t=1683989441; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references:dkim-signature; bh=PfvNWfYIIWIRWEHQD8crp/SoClmu5I86Qy9CoY3S8QY=; b=RlQNzmR2qXKth9TF0bsQpnWZ+jq6IaKALNKjpNpnNkOJsPTEfkWL6lNRYA0f2g7oEAPZzO wPM00n32elnuN5Gb49DUFb+Rgr3H01YmvkSR/7hKsYKMVfAvvdCu7GvOC0YQCy6snef4d8 zANvtJH+iT3qvsXJvPHu0z5kzaVEckIP7BmmnX+9oq+U5Byhz+C9zUJae1aEHU1QvEm2D4 1ucEWkm3RDZKH1Nu41e+xAMuFcDHGo27O0Z4SByFKhlpgFvZcFEVOzzZCUHPs8NdmsgGnu rmMlgVDP99+1Bl52Dwr/jR9AjHvMrYLOaj6XE9+KEGHn1aQG9kpXdOrtsY7D3A==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; rspamd-5cdf8fd7d9-qfmcz; auth=pass smtp.auth=hostingeremail smtp.mailfrom=dhc@dcrocker.net
X-Sender-Id: hostingeremail|x-authsender|dhc@dcrocker.net
X-MC-Relay: Neutral
X-MailChannels-SenderId: hostingeremail|x-authsender|dhc@dcrocker.net
X-MailChannels-Auth-Id: hostingeremail
X-Gusty-Skirt: 2eed8c83051b8159_1683989441523_3233515489
X-MC-Loop-Signature: 1683989441523:665211230
X-MC-Ingress-Time: 1683989441523
Received: from uk-fast-smtpout1.hostinger.io (uk-fast-smtpout1.hostinger.io [31.220.23.35]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) by 100.127.59.19 (trex/6.8.1); Sat, 13 May 2023 14:50:41 +0000
Received: from [10.10.5.9] (unknown [64.60.50.130]) (Authenticated sender: dhc@dcrocker.net) by smtp.hostinger.com (smtp.hostinger.com) with ESMTPSA id 4QJT8G501tzFd2Jh; Sat, 13 May 2023 14:50:38 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=dcrocker.net; s=hostingermail-a; t=1683989439; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=PfvNWfYIIWIRWEHQD8crp/SoClmu5I86Qy9CoY3S8QY=; b=Ac5zyGUoNphbwpGVjM3ZFIMEH3SCldi9l0fDWfAd3sEc94IrR7ZZn4I0pUim+BZwk+FHGi EyAtjew7cYwdTMAsrlMR6TJpeOWkui/r1dOB29ecGACGGe1cGLdUTkT9LstZZ4fGCzDPdX B781P8ZAZJN0MBiOFfmVPYUuxwPUQSW8wUrguhT3eLuNSKjAo2GuPj7imX5Y+016qdnsT9 ee9JzR16yr+Jy8luyon/o1lxE8uyJ11yf4JOdjhPmAkDfj0drbTKLqfaOhQfY+uq13m3R5 ppyBD9L7rG/7yygZ7afyuGu1iDjSMcfvRnmDtyXWTYeR0plCWHC4HWmcpU/cKw==
Message-ID: <63ad51d8-8b33-05aa-bf74-e385f5c4b503@dcrocker.net>
Date: Sat, 13 May 2023 07:50:37 -0700
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.11.0
Reply-To: dcrocker@bbiw.net
To: Ken O'Driscoll <ken@kenodriscoll.com>, "Brotman, Alex" <Alex_Brotman=40comcast.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
Cc: "BIMI (IETF)" <bimi@ietf.org>
References: <MN2PR11MB4351AF35F579FBC34B97D7A6F7759@MN2PR11MB4351.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> <535f1c438cc05398875f30b857725722@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Language: en-US
From: Dave Crocker <dhc@dcrocker.net>
Organization: Brandenburg InternetWorking
In-Reply-To: <535f1c438cc05398875f30b857725722@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-CM-Envelope: MS4xfCwAMVSlqUsHJrOYLuXGdq/IEHUePaMdJQgYAKa+SGHf/zpPJ+mact6DTa1sF3CP6vIlVEKzDxWZvZY61yTFQzHrnaTu5aDahwPuiKsQuHtaOJDUC+cK uXK4i7Df6/7yWFeAlyvnS947rrobVk0IUwkBy80cycLc5DL4BA3sbcgN4u+kZDXDfeaNEkz8SZKsizc4KV5bsCb2aryw7C7t/UkgZlsmbyKXTquPE9VpW0iW s/7gank6tzIXM9XyqEARjohzI322KEIABKzq95SmuH0=
X-CM-Analysis: v=2.4 cv=O/kqATxW c=1 sm=1 tr=0 ts=645fa3bf a=Fjc48FMsbL3/3LQU8hQCzQ==:117 a=Fjc48FMsbL3/3LQU8hQCzQ==:17 a=IkcTkHD0fZMA:10 a=k7Ga1wGzAAAA:8 a=8TFXEHHITMQaDRj96hwA:9 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10 a=ijMaxGghyylP-n2pFjDB:22
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bimi/-jqFPOJ7S5zVeVc40Lm0E0oGGhE>
Subject: Re: [Bimi] BIMI/DMARC & PSL vs Tree-walk
X-BeenThere: bimi@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Brand Indicators for Message Identification <bimi.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/bimi>, <mailto:bimi-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/bimi/>
List-Post: <mailto:bimi@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bimi-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bimi>, <mailto:bimi-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 13 May 2023 14:50:48 -0000

On 5/13/2023 7:22 AM, Ken O'Driscoll wrote:
> I think it fundamentally matters that the 5322.From domain would have a
> "blue tick" implying it implements BIMI, and by extension DMARC with an
> enforcing policy, when in fact it may not. Isn’t that the whole raison
> d'être for BIMI?

No.  Bimi is a mechanism for creating (or ensuring) brand impressions.

DMARC, etc., are tag-alongs.

d/

-- 
Dave Crocker
Brandenburg InternetWorking
bbiw.net
mast:@dcrocker@mastodon.social